2008
DOI: 10.1002/pssa.200723509
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Introducing crystalline rare‐earth oxides into Si technologies

Abstract: The ability to integrate crystalline metal oxide dielectric barrier layers into silicon structures can open the way for a variety of novel applications which enhances the functionality and flexibility ranging from high‐K replacements in future MOS devices to oxide/silicon/oxide heterostructures for nanoelectronic application in quantum‐effect devices. We present results for crystalline gadolinium oxides on silicon in the cubic bixbyite structure grown by solid source molecular beam epitaxy. Additional oxygen s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

4
67
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6 While several different crystalline oxides can be grown on semiconductors, the growth of semiconductors on oxides usually results in polycrystalline growth and/or three-dimensional (3D) growth modes. 8 10,11 An important advance in this field was the realization of so-called crystalline oxide on semiconductors (COS) by McKee et al 12 This group used an interface with the composition of Zintl-phase SrSi 2 with a thickness of one-half monolayer to grow epitaxial SrTiO 3 on silicon substrates. 13 In this sense, Zintl-Klemm interfaces between oxides and semiconductors are ideal candidates to enable wetting, thus minimizing interfacial energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 While several different crystalline oxides can be grown on semiconductors, the growth of semiconductors on oxides usually results in polycrystalline growth and/or three-dimensional (3D) growth modes. 8 10,11 An important advance in this field was the realization of so-called crystalline oxide on semiconductors (COS) by McKee et al 12 This group used an interface with the composition of Zintl-phase SrSi 2 with a thickness of one-half monolayer to grow epitaxial SrTiO 3 on silicon substrates. 13 In this sense, Zintl-Klemm interfaces between oxides and semiconductors are ideal candidates to enable wetting, thus minimizing interfacial energy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 7,8) Despite the epitaxial growth of these M 2 O 3 oxides, a systematic characterization of their crystal structures and orientation relationships with Si substrates using X-ray diffraction has not yet been well developed. This is mainly due to the experimental complications in directly characterizing the interface matching using the X-ray diffraction from in-plane direction, although basic knowledge of either the grown oxides or the substrates can be provided independently from out-of-plane direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been demonstrated in case of molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) grown LnO thin films that additional oxygen supply during growth often facilitates reduction of V Os [9,13]. However, continuous increase in the oxygen partial pressure ( which have been attempted to compensate such defects, often degrade the dielectric properties of such heterostructures due to the formation of an interfacial layer with lower κ values [14,15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epitaxial layers of various insulating binary lanthanide oxides (LnOs) which offer superior thermal and thermodynamic stabilities in contact with Si, large band gap, and band offset to Si, in addition to suitably large κ values, have been considered as potential candidates for the 2 nd generation of high-κ dielectric materials to continue the downscaling of CMOS devices [4,9]. Nevertheless, despite their excellent microstructural qualities, most of these oxides suffer from poor electrical properties, such as high leakage current density, instability in the threshold voltage and poor reliability, owing to the number of defects generated during either the layer growth or typical CMOS process steps [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%