2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.fas.2009.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intra-articular sodium hyaluronate injections in the osteoarthritic ankle joint: Effects, safety and dose dependency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in studies about the intra-articular effects of HA in other joints, it is to be expected that a larger amount of HA or repeated infiltration series have a better effect than a single infiltration regimen. [60,66] However, due to the difficulty of infiltrating, for instance, an amount of 6 mL of HA, because an infiltration of the hip is technically more demanding, and due to the fact that repeating infiltrations of placebo in RCTs is an ethical problem, it is difficult to prove that larger doses and repeated series of HA are better than the amount of HA used in the studies discussed here.…”
Section: Injection Technique and Number Of Injectionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As shown in studies about the intra-articular effects of HA in other joints, it is to be expected that a larger amount of HA or repeated infiltration series have a better effect than a single infiltration regimen. [60,66] However, due to the difficulty of infiltrating, for instance, an amount of 6 mL of HA, because an infiltration of the hip is technically more demanding, and due to the fact that repeating infiltrations of placebo in RCTs is an ethical problem, it is difficult to prove that larger doses and repeated series of HA are better than the amount of HA used in the studies discussed here.…”
Section: Injection Technique and Number Of Injectionsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Clinical benefit was evaluated by means of different scales (Visual Analogic Scale, Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society, Short Form -12, Short Form -36, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index), and the follow -up period varied from 6 to 18 months. In studies performed without control group (Hanson et al, 1999;Luciani et al, 2008;MeiDan et al, 2010;Sun et al, 2006;Valiveti et al, 2006;Witteveen et al, 2008Witteveen et al, , 2010 (Table 2), an improvement in all the outcome measures was reported, with the effect lasting for 18 months (Luciani et al, 2008). However, it is not clear from reports whether the pain reduction was clinically significant, or could be ascribed only to a placebo effect.…”
Section: Ankle Osteoarthritismentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Only few studies have been performed in ankle osteoarthritis and, among these, four were randomized / controlled trials (level of evidence 1) (Carpenter & Motley, 2008;Cohen et al, 2008;Karatosun et al, 2008;Salk et al, 2005Salk et al, , 2006, while seven studies (Hanson et al, 1999;Luciani et al, 2008;Mei -Dan et al, 2010;Sun et al, 2006;Valiveti et al, 2006;Witteveen et al, 2008Witteveen et al, , 2010 were case series (level of evidence 4). In all these studies, patients suffering from post -traumatic Kellgreen -Lawrence grade II -IV ankle osteoarthritis were enrolled.…”
Section: Ankle Osteoarthritismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In ankle OA, viscosupplementation demonstrated evidence for signifi cant improvement after 1 and 6 months of fi ve weekly injections in a prospective randomized double-blind trial [ 34 ]. A randomized control trial (RCT) was done by Witteveen et al [ 35 ] of 70 patients who received HA injection into the joint under fl uoroscopy versus distraction in patients with severe OA. There is no signifi cant difference between the two injection methods regarding any of our formulated outcome measures.…”
Section: Nonsurgical Treatment/foot and Ankle Carementioning
confidence: 98%