2014
DOI: 10.5430/elr.v3n1p39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interviewing as a Data Collection Method: A Critical Review

Abstract: Through this paper I critically assess the value and limitations of interviewing as a research instrument. Therefore, my discussion, which would be based on methodological issues allied with the use of interviews in qualitative social science research, is twofold. Firstly, I briefly review the literature concerning the use of interviews, discuss interviews' types and illustrate the differences between these types. Then, issues regarding interviewing in practice will be discussed, ending this part with a brief … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
265
0
27

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 361 publications
(294 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
265
0
27
Order By: Relevance
“…There are some advantages of in-depth interviews. The interviewer can devote complete attention to each research participant, listen actively and establish good result; better sampling because recruiting is easier when scheduling in-depth interviews and researchers need fewer respondents to attain the same results; useful with difficult recruiting because its only need to accommodate one individual; it's also elicit candid responses in a private setting regarding personal and/or professional topics of discussion; fewer distractions; faster and cheaper; more productive; deeper Insights; more flexible, and faster adaptation (Turner, 2010;Mack et.al., 2011;Alshenqeeti, 2014). The findings of this study are structured base on Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) which is considered as government policy to improve the competiveness in global market and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions as well as paying attention to environmental issues by Ministry of Agriculture.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some advantages of in-depth interviews. The interviewer can devote complete attention to each research participant, listen actively and establish good result; better sampling because recruiting is easier when scheduling in-depth interviews and researchers need fewer respondents to attain the same results; useful with difficult recruiting because its only need to accommodate one individual; it's also elicit candid responses in a private setting regarding personal and/or professional topics of discussion; fewer distractions; faster and cheaper; more productive; deeper Insights; more flexible, and faster adaptation (Turner, 2010;Mack et.al., 2011;Alshenqeeti, 2014). The findings of this study are structured base on Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil (ISPO) which is considered as government policy to improve the competiveness in global market and to reduce greenhouse gas emissions as well as paying attention to environmental issues by Ministry of Agriculture.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As analysts point out, this is the most used type of interview in qualitative researchers (Alshenqeeti, 2014). Just like structured interviews, this type of interview also an outline of topics and questions prepared by the researcher (Stuckey, 2013).…”
Section: Semi-structured Interviewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then the other section consisted of 37 items rated on five-point Likert scale (5= strongly agree, 4= agree, 3= unsure, 2=disagree, 1= strongly disagree) to investigate teachers" beliefs about learner autonomy. Interviews were conducted after administering the teacher questionnaire as it is regarded as a more powerful tool for eliciting narrative data that allows researchers to investigate people's perception and views about the items examined in the questionnaire in greater depth (Alshenqeeti, 2014). Structured interview was conducted with 10 of the participated teachers.…”
Section: Teacher Questionnairementioning
confidence: 99%