2020
DOI: 10.1111/josi.12409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intersectionality and relations between oppressed groups: Intergroup implications of beliefs about intersectional differences and commonalities

Abstract: Social psychological research on relations between oppressed groups has highlighted the role of how people compare their own and other groups’ oppression—that is, comparative victim beliefs. However, this research has examined comparative victim beliefs concerning single‐identity groups such as ethnicity or religion. Consequently, beliefs regarding experiences of oppression based on multiple intersecting identities (e.g., race, class, and gender)—that is, intersectional consciousness—have been overlooked. Inte… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This corresponds to the social recategorization literature, which distinguishes between making only superordinate identities salient or also subgroup differences (Dovidio, et al., 2009; Hornsey & Hogg, 2000). It also speaks to the idea that inclusive victim beliefs sometimes mask power differences between groups (McNeill & Vollhardt, 2020; Nair & Vollhardt, 2020; Vollhardt, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This corresponds to the social recategorization literature, which distinguishes between making only superordinate identities salient or also subgroup differences (Dovidio, et al., 2009; Hornsey & Hogg, 2000). It also speaks to the idea that inclusive victim beliefs sometimes mask power differences between groups (McNeill & Vollhardt, 2020; Nair & Vollhardt, 2020; Vollhardt, 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more nuanced assessment of comparative victim beliefs should also include the perception that the ingroup suffered less , and not more than other victim groups. Although this polar opposite of competitive victimhood makes sense in many contexts, downward comparisons of suffering have not received much research attention so far (but see Nair & Vollhardt, 2019, 2020; Twali, 2019). Downward comparisons of collective victimization seem particularly important among high power groups in asymmetric conflicts, as these comparisons acknowledge the outgroup's collective victimization as well as power differences.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Inclusive victim consciousness should not be confused with the assertion that experiences of suffering are the "same" (Nair and Vollhardt 2020). Although this is one way in which people may express a sense of shared grief and loss with other groups, claiming that two groups suffered in the same way or to the same degree often disregards power relations and different histories of oppression (Vollhardt and Twali 2016).…”
Section: What Inclusive Victim Consciousness Is Notmentioning
confidence: 99%