Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms

Abstract

The development of commercially viable new products requires that technological and market possibilities are linked effectively in the product's design. Innovators in large firms have persistent problems with such linking, however. This research examines these problems by focusing on the shared interpretive schemes people use to make sense of product innovation. Two interpretive schemes are found to inhibit development of technology-market knowledge: departmental thought worlds and organizational product routines. The paper describes in some depth differences among the thought worlds which keep innovators from synthesizing their expertise. The paper also details how organizational routines exacerbate problems with learning, and how successful innovators overcome both interpretive barriers. The main implication of the study is that to improve innovation in large firms it is necessary to deal explicitly with the interpretive barriers described here. Suggestions for practice and research are offered.

Marginality and Problem-Solving Effectiveness in Broadcast Search

“…Potentially productive marginalized solvers, who are to a large extent highly trained and talented individuals who could not enter core positions in their fields, read "women scientists," might be more capable of approaching problems in fresh ways, one of which is likely to uniquely match a given problem. Here the "forced" social marginality of women in science, in effect an exclusion from the thought worlds (Dougherty 1992) of their own scientific fields, may provide a fleeting advantage in an overwhelmingly disadvantaged social position.…”

Should marketing be cross-functional? Conceptual development and international empirical evidence

“…There has been a significant amount of research interest in the topics of cross-functional teams (e.g., Ancona, 1990;Ancona and Caldwell, 1992;Denison et al, 1996;Dougherty, 1992) and marketing's cross-functional interfaces (e.g., Griffin and Hauser, 1996;Karmarkar, 1996;Montgomery and Webster, 1997;Workman, 1993). Given our research interest in the question of whether decisions on marketing activities should be made cross-functionally, we see three areas of related research.…”

The Influence of Communication on Knowledge Integration in CFTs: A Case of Chinese Mobile Applications Enterprise

“…Thus each member understands the problems, critical elements, and steps in solving the problem differently from each other member (Dougherty, 1992). This heterogeneity of knowledge domain could facilitate "creative abrasion" (Iansiti, 1995), especially, the creative abrasion between the members who possess technical knowledge and application domain knowledge is more obvious compared with homogeneous knowledge.…”