2011
DOI: 10.5755/j01.ss.73.3.794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internationalization in Retail Trade Services Market as Latecomer Countries Problem: the Case of Lithuania

Abstract: The aim of the article is to examine the specificity of internationalization in the market of retail trade services. The article focuses on the role of retail trade services sector in Lithuanian as a latecomer country. This sector has encountered increasing competition recently not only due to sharp competition between local players, but also due to the entries of overseas players to the market. Internationalization as a phenomenon touched the retail trade services sector in Lithuania not very long time ago. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas the share of five largest fast moving consumer goods retailers' market share exceeds 60 % in some EU member countries (Germany, France Austria) and even 80 % (Sweden, Denmark and Finland), its value in Serbia amounts to under 40 % (ACNielsen, 2005;Metro Retail Compendium, 2011). This percentage is also far lower than the market share of the four largest retailers in Lithuania, accounting to more than 73 % (Langviniene & Sekliuckiene, 2011). Significantly lower share of followers is manifested through certain disproportions in market competition so that a slight rise in gross margin does not lead to a decline in the inventory turnover rate.…”
Section: Conclusion and Directions For Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Whereas the share of five largest fast moving consumer goods retailers' market share exceeds 60 % in some EU member countries (Germany, France Austria) and even 80 % (Sweden, Denmark and Finland), its value in Serbia amounts to under 40 % (ACNielsen, 2005;Metro Retail Compendium, 2011). This percentage is also far lower than the market share of the four largest retailers in Lithuania, accounting to more than 73 % (Langviniene & Sekliuckiene, 2011). Significantly lower share of followers is manifested through certain disproportions in market competition so that a slight rise in gross margin does not lead to a decline in the inventory turnover rate.…”
Section: Conclusion and Directions For Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In the developed EU countries (Germany, France and the UK), as well as the highest developed transition countries (Slovenia, the Czech Republic and Slovakia), the share of modern retail facilities amounts to over 80 % and 60 % respectively (Lovreta, 2009;Metro Retail Compendium, 2011). According to (Langviniene & Sekliuckiene, 2011), in modern retail formats in Lithuania, the total turnover makes 61.9 percent of the food sector market share. As well as low diversity, limited space and higher prices, smaller retail outlets are also characterised by higher gross margins compared to other, larger retail outlets (Levy & Weitz, 2012).…”
Section: Conclusion and Directions For Further Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The attractiveness of a shopping center and its functional attributes are inseparable. Often, customers make decisions about the choice of a center based on its image characteristics and image [21]. In branding theories, the term brand image often creates the distinctive character of many products in the mind of the consumer.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reikli (2012) [9] also indirectly considered the affected consumers, but did not directly examine their provisions on the choice of the type of traded object. In Lithuania, there is little research on the evaluation of shopping center factors, but the development of retail trade companies is being studied a lot by authors: Žitkienė and Sekliuckienė (2003) [18], Vengrauskas and Rudienė (2011) [19], Gudonavičienė and Alijošienė, (2013) [20], Sekliuckiene and Langviniene (2011) [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%