2018
DOI: 10.18568/1980-4865.13163-76
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Internationalization and innovation: The case of a born global from Brazil

Abstract: The significance of Born Global firms´ study is increasing due to their early internationalization aspects, innovation and economic growth; however, most of existent studies are focused on developed markets. This is the reason why this study is addressed to analyze the internationalization effects on the innovation in a Born Global firm from emerging market. We have used the literature review about innovation, internationalization and Born Global from emerging markets, also an in-depth interview with the found… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(64 reference statements)
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The significance of entrepreneurial orientation in the internationalization process was also visible in the studies of Yoon, Kim, and Dedahanov [34] as well as the work by Etemad [19]. Zonta and Amal [106] indicated the importance of innovativeness among all components of entrepreneurial orientation, especially for born global firms. Matiusinaite and Sekliuckiene [107] observed that risk-taking and initiative are regarded as being among the most important determinants in finding international opportunities and increasing the volume of international activities.…”
Section: Scientific Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The significance of entrepreneurial orientation in the internationalization process was also visible in the studies of Yoon, Kim, and Dedahanov [34] as well as the work by Etemad [19]. Zonta and Amal [106] indicated the importance of innovativeness among all components of entrepreneurial orientation, especially for born global firms. Matiusinaite and Sekliuckiene [107] observed that risk-taking and initiative are regarded as being among the most important determinants in finding international opportunities and increasing the volume of international activities.…”
Section: Scientific Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The authors suggest that innovativeness impacts the perceived ease of use way stronger than the perceived usefulness. As product-related innovativeness is not only integral to the performance of a company [28] but also reported to be among the factors that have a significant impact on its level of internationalization [29], it found its way into business maturity assessment. For instance, Aguiar et al used the Design Science Research method to set up a staged digital transformation capability maturity model that may be taken advantage of to guide managers in enhancing the IT capability of their companies [30].…”
Section: Related Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, it should be noted that the specificity of the domain of application may inherently exclude some initial factor or reduce the importance of a given factor after model reconstruction. Thus, it became necessary to set up hypotheses verifying the relationships between the variables originally confirmed as significantly influencing the TAM2 core [4] The impact of previous research suggests that the specificity of the computer networking domain warrants tailor-fitting the structural TAM model with two additional latent variables: The former is crucial in the context of global businesses [28][29][30], which certainly include the high-tech business of network hardware development, and a similar rationale was previously considered in extensions [26,27]. While [27] did not confirm a significant effect on perceived usefulness, we reckon that network professionals are a target group open to technological advances and appreciate most aspects of innovation.…”
Section: Tam2 Model Customization and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The practice that organizations have adopted for decades to develop new products and services is a model focused on closed innovation, which has been confronted by an opposite practice called open innovation (Carolina Zonta & Amal, 2018;Chesbrough & Crowther, 2006). For Chesbrough and Crowther (2006) and Ketchen, Ireland, and Snow (2007), the concept of open innovation focuses on the search for, mainly done by R&D departments, innovations and innovative resources at external sources through the sharing of resources such as skills, knowledge and technology.…”
Section: Literature Review Open Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%