International opportunity development of born global firms: the role of institutions

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of the study is to investigate the international opportunity development process of born global firms embedded in two different institutional contexts: China, an emerging economy and Italy, a developed country. Drawing on the entrepreneurial opportunity literature and institutional theory, this study explores and draws insights into how home country institutions of born globals can influence the international opportunity development process of the firms. Design/methodology/approach This paper adopts a qualitative case study approach with in-depth, semi-structured interviews of six born global companies from China and Italy. In doing so, this study uses a flexible pattern matching design, which is consistent with the qualitative research design of the paper. Findings The findings of the study indicate that home institutions play an influential, yet differential role in the international opportunity development processes of Chinese and Italian born global firms. While the Italian firms shape their opportunities mainly through product innovation, their Chinese counterparts develop opportunities primarily through networks embedded in their home institutional context. Originality/value The key contributions of the paper relate to an integrated analysis of the international opportunity development process of born globals in China and Italy based on institutional theory, which has received limited attention in the international entrepreneurship literature. In addition, the study advances the similarities and differences in the international opportunity development process in two different countries, thus providing valuable insights for policymakers and practitioners to enter international markets successfully.

Innovation and international business: A systematic literature review

“…Finally, the fourth theme is Cross-border knowledge, which, in the internationalization context, impacts on the potential innovation of the countries [ 64 ], requiring relevant changes in their innovation networks [ 95 ]. In this sense, interaction and communication among their different intra-organizational networks facilitate multinational corporation knowledge transfer [ 122 ], whereas born global firms exploit different types of knowledge and networks to develop international opportunities [ 123 ]. Consequently, Freixanet and Churakova [ 124 ] point out to a reduction in the transaction costs as companies gain internationalization knowledge.…”

The digitalisation as gender equaliser? The import and export of digitally delivered services in shaping female entrepreneurship in European countries

“…The problem of internationalisation and entrepreneurship is studied together in the international entrepreneurship stream, focussing mainly on the problem of the timing, entry modes, speed, and scope of becoming international by entrepreneurs and entrepreneurial companies. The concepts of born global companies, international new ventures, early and/or rapid internationalisation are studied in comparison with traditional staged internationalisation models (Paul and Rosado-Serrano, 2019; Romanello et al ., 2022). Such an approach pushes entrepreneurship studies towards IB literature.…”

Market exit and re-entry in a volatile emerging economy: a case study of Yamaha motorcycles in Pakistan

“…The subsidiary operations of MNEs in emerging economies are also significantly influenced by the regulatory networks (and ambiguities) that restrict local activities and operations (Ahworegba et al , 2022; Arslan and Larimo, 2017; Gaur et al , 2019). Institutions also play vital role in entrepreneurial activities (Ferreira et al , 2023) and international opportunity development (Romanello et al , 2022). All these factors eventually drive the success or failure of MNEs in their host markets, including their entry mode choices.…”