2021
DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2020.588458
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Legal Approaches to Neurosurgery for Psychiatric Disorders

Abstract: Neurosurgery for psychiatric disorders (NPD), also sometimes referred to as psychosurgery, is rapidly evolving, with new techniques and indications being investigated actively. Many within the field have suggested that some form of guidelines or regulations are needed to help ensure that a promising field develops safely. Multiple countries have enacted specific laws regulating NPD. This article reviews NPD-specific laws drawn from North and South America, Asia and Europe, in order to identify the typical form… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mental health legislation in multiple countries, specifically addressing neurosurgery for psychiatric disorders, includes psychiatric applications of DBS within the scope of the laws ( Nadler and Chandler, 2019 ; Chandler et al, 2021 ). Many of these laws are quite recent ( Mental Health Act, Scotland, 2003 ; Mental Health Act, Australia, 2014 ; Mental Healthcare Act, India, 2017 ), revealing continued social and legal attention to neurosurgical treatments especially to address psychiatric conditions.…”
Section: Neuroethics Cases: Dilemmas That Inform the Future Of Neurom...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mental health legislation in multiple countries, specifically addressing neurosurgery for psychiatric disorders, includes psychiatric applications of DBS within the scope of the laws ( Nadler and Chandler, 2019 ; Chandler et al, 2021 ). Many of these laws are quite recent ( Mental Health Act, Scotland, 2003 ; Mental Health Act, Australia, 2014 ; Mental Healthcare Act, India, 2017 ), revealing continued social and legal attention to neurosurgical treatments especially to address psychiatric conditions.…”
Section: Neuroethics Cases: Dilemmas That Inform the Future Of Neurom...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many of these laws are quite recent ( Mental Health Act, Scotland, 2003 ; Mental Health Act, Australia, 2014 ; Mental Healthcare Act, India, 2017 ), revealing continued social and legal attention to neurosurgical treatments especially to address psychiatric conditions. These laws often address the following general issues: restricted eligibility of particular populations for psychiatric neurosurgery (particularly incapable patients, children, prisoners and involuntarily hospitalized patients), independent pre-surgical approval processes sometimes including courts or mental health tribunals, and record-keeping and post-surgical reporting requirements ( Chandler et al, 2021 ). The 1977 report on psychosurgery by a US National Commission made recommendations in each of these areas.…”
Section: Neuroethics Cases: Dilemmas That Inform the Future Of Neurom...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…38 From a medicolegal perspective, existing legal frameworks regarding the use of psychiatric neurosurgery have been identified to be inconsistent both within or across countries and are based on a concept of strict dualism between the mind and brain that does not reflect the current scientific understanding of the primacy of the nervous system in the genesis and expression of emotional disorders. 39 It has been proposed that attending to these and other neuroethical issues can complement and advance neuroscience by providing a critical lens on identifying and addressing the implications of discoveries in the basic and clinical neurosciences and their implementation, such as the new technologies and interventional approaches outlined in this paper. 40 Indeed, all major nationally endorsed neuroscience initiatives, including the Canadian Brain Research Strategy, 41 have prioritized funding for exploration of neuroethical issues.…”
Section: Neuroethical Implications Of Interventional Psychiatry and N...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved devices for deep brain stimulation of different subcortical brain targets for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (subthalamic nucleus or globus pallidus internus), dystonia (globus pallidus internus), essential tremor (ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus), and severe obsessive-compulsive disorder (anterior limb of the internal capsule). In addition, an active research field continues to explore deep brain stimulation for other indications, including epilepsy, major depression, Alzheimer’s disease, obesity, or substance use disorders, although current regulations remain unclear ( Chandler and others 2021 ). However, the early research efforts of the 1950s also revealed the risks of this line of investigation.…”
Section: History Of Direct Human Brain Manipulationmentioning
confidence: 99%