2015
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9781316337028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International Humanitarian Law

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 161 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of the distinction between so-called "Hague law" (law regulating how war/violence is used by states) and "Geneva law" (law regulating the treatment of victims of war) (see e.g. [8]), the concept moves easily between both fields of war law. Perhaps also noteworthy is that another significant document for this concept is the 1977 Additional Protocol 1, with its focus on "provisions protecting the victims of armed conflicts".…”
Section: Using the Corpus For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In terms of the distinction between so-called "Hague law" (law regulating how war/violence is used by states) and "Geneva law" (law regulating the treatment of victims of war) (see e.g. [8]), the concept moves easily between both fields of war law. Perhaps also noteworthy is that another significant document for this concept is the 1977 Additional Protocol 1, with its focus on "provisions protecting the victims of armed conflicts".…”
Section: Using the Corpus For Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper introduces the new Macquarie Laws of War Corpus, or MQLWC. The term 'Laws of War', also known as the 'Law of Armed Conflict' (LOAC) and 'International Humanitarian Law' (IHL) [8], refers to a body of international treaties and documents written in principle to regulate the use of force in international and noninternational armed conflicts, although, as discussed below, the history and function of this body of law is very much contested. The MQLWC encompasses the documents held in a treaties database by the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To any Occupying State is given the obligations and duties, before the Occupied State, regarding the protection of the human rights of the population. At the same time, the mandatory laws of the International Armed Conflict Law govern, regardless of resistance to the occupation (CRAWFORD; PERT, 2015). If there is resistance, conflicts of rules are accentuated, as the Occupying power must simultaneously protect the human rights of the Occupied Population and do what is necessary and sufficientwithin the principle of the military necessity of IHL -to achieve its military objectives.…”
Section: The Dichotomies In the Field In The Complex Relationship Of Occupant State-occupied Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intergovernmental Working Group to consider developing an international legal framework to regulate the monitoring and control of PMSCs based on the draft text proposed by the Working Group. 4 Thirtytwo states (including Russia) voted in favor of the establishment of the Working Group, 12 voted against (United Kingdom, United States, etc. ), and three abstained (Switzerland, etc.…”
Section: The Work Of the Open-ended Intergovernmental Working Group Tmentioning
confidence: 99%