2023
DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002364
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

International and Multicenter Prospective Controlled Study of Dysphagia After Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery

Abstract: BACKGROUND: In the context of anterior approach to the cervical spine, dysphagia is a common complication and still without a clear distinction of risk factors. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the risk factors of dysphagia after cervical spine surgery. METHODS: Multicenter prospective study evaluated patients who underwent anterior cervical spine surgery for degenerative pathologies, studying surgical, anesthesia, base disease, and radiological variables (preoperatively, 24 hours, 1 and 3 weeks, and 6 months after surge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since its rst report by Robinson and Smith in 1958 [1], anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has proven to be an effective and well-standardized surgical strategy for treating patients with cervical spondylopathy (CS) [2]. Despite its advantages, ACDF may still have surgical complications common to anterior cervical surgery, such as nerve injury [3], esophageal stula [4], dysphagia [5], and carotid artery compression [6]. By tracing the root cause of the aforementioned problems, the application of a retractor was possible [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since its rst report by Robinson and Smith in 1958 [1], anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has proven to be an effective and well-standardized surgical strategy for treating patients with cervical spondylopathy (CS) [2]. Despite its advantages, ACDF may still have surgical complications common to anterior cervical surgery, such as nerve injury [3], esophageal stula [4], dysphagia [5], and carotid artery compression [6]. By tracing the root cause of the aforementioned problems, the application of a retractor was possible [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,5,6 Several risk factors, including age, female sex, revision surgery, upper cervical spine, multilevel fusion, use of plate instrumentation, surgical time, and intraoperative blood loss, have been reported. 1,2,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Prevertebral soft tissue swelling of the retropharyngeal space (RS) has also been proposed as a risk factor. [17][18][19][20][21] However, its clinical significance in the assessment of the risk of postoperative dysphagia remains unclear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%