2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.10.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intermittent versus continuous exercise training in chronic heart failure: A meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
70
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
70
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Our search indicates that interventions using this combined training demonstrate more effective adaptations related to cardiorespiratory fitness when compared to other intervention protocols. Our findings are similar to those that reported increased maximal oxygen uptake in patients with hypertension 29 , overweight and obese adolescents 10 and in patients with chronic heart failure 30 . The present data suggest that combined training (HIIT / SIT + RT) may promote higher VO 2max benefits when compared to other training methods, specifically when compared with the RT method, although HIIT / SIT training as well as combined CT + RT training may also promote benefits in VO 2max 24,28 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our search indicates that interventions using this combined training demonstrate more effective adaptations related to cardiorespiratory fitness when compared to other intervention protocols. Our findings are similar to those that reported increased maximal oxygen uptake in patients with hypertension 29 , overweight and obese adolescents 10 and in patients with chronic heart failure 30 . The present data suggest that combined training (HIIT / SIT + RT) may promote higher VO 2max benefits when compared to other training methods, specifically when compared with the RT method, although HIIT / SIT training as well as combined CT + RT training may also promote benefits in VO 2max 24,28 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The present data suggest that combined training (HIIT / SIT + RT) may promote higher VO 2max benefits when compared to other training methods, specifically when compared with the RT method, although HIIT / SIT training as well as combined CT + RT training may also promote benefits in VO 2max 24,28 . Our results corroborate with the findings of a meta-analysis conducted in 2013 comparing interval training with other exercise protocols, including HIIT / SIT + RT on cardiorespiratory fitness in elderly patients with chronic heart failure, in which the authors pointed out a greater effectiveness in results in protocols that combine interval training and resistance training in cardiorespiratory fitness, provided that with similar energy expenditure 30 . In this sense, combining these two types of training, adaptations are Figure 3.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The greater beneficial effects of HIIT may be, in part, due to a greater generation of large shear stress forces within the endothelium leading to improvements in endothelial function, and promotion of an increase in muscle mass, hence improving oxygen metabolism. 78 However, it must be noted that endurance training-induced increases in VO2peak could also occur independent of any changes in endothelial function in patients with heart failure, 79 16 reported similar increases in VO2peak following HIIT and MICT in a group of HFrEF patients, which contrasts with the studies above. As the training protocols were not isocaloric (of similar dose), the authors suggested that the lack of a superior HIIT effect could perhaps be attributed to the lower amount of total work performed with HIIT compared to MICT in the study (HIIT, ~588 kcal/week vs. MICT, ~705 kcal/week).…”
Section: Heart Failurementioning
confidence: 84%
“…Furthermore, highintensity exercise training was better than moderate-intensity exercise in improving cardiorespiratory fitness [35].…”
Section: Impact Of High Intensity Interval Versus Moderate Intensity mentioning
confidence: 95%