1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf00610461
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interlimb coordinating factors during driven walking in Crustacea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The animals were tethered at the carapace and walked on a motor driven treadmill. The weight of the tether was counter-balanced so that the animal supported only its own weight (for details see Chasserat and Clarac, 1980). Anterior extreme position (AEP) and posterior extreme position (PEP) of legs (legs 3, 4, and 5) were measured using a ruler fixed outside the aquarium parallel to the longitudinal axis of the body.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The animals were tethered at the carapace and walked on a motor driven treadmill. The weight of the tether was counter-balanced so that the animal supported only its own weight (for details see Chasserat and Clarac, 1980). Anterior extreme position (AEP) and posterior extreme position (PEP) of legs (legs 3, 4, and 5) were measured using a ruler fixed outside the aquarium parallel to the longitudinal axis of the body.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter case the animal was tethered at the carapace and the weight of the holder was counter-balanced so that the animal could choose its own distance to the ground [see Chasserat and Clarac (1980) for details]. The results were recorded on magnetic tape or directly on a pen recorder (Gould Brush 2200).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results of Ayers and Davis (1977) seem to show a corresponding tendency which is however much less obvious when using electrophysiological techniques. The increase of the force might be the result of a conflict between the walking speed intended by the animal and the actual speed of the treadmill (Chasserat and Clarac, 1980;Cruse and Clarac, in preparation). One possible explanation of this observation is to assume a servomechanism controlling the position of each leg.…”
Section: Comparison Between Free and Treadmill Walkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations