Interlaboratory comparison of traceable atomic force microscope pitch measurements

Abstract

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Advanced Surface Microscopy (ASM), and the National Metrology Centre (NMC) of the Agency for Science, Technology, and Research (A*STAR) in Singapore have completed a three-way interlaboratory comparison of traceable pitch measurements using atomic force microscopy (AFM). The specimen being used for this comparison is provided by ASM and consists of SiO 2 lines having a 70 nm pitch patterned on a silicon substrate.NIST has a multifaceted program in atomic force microscope (AFM) dimensional metrology. One component of this effort is a custom in-house metrology AFM, called the calibrated AFM (C-AFM). The NIST C-AFM has displacement metrology for all three axes traceable to the 633 nm wavelength of the iodine-stabilized He-Ne laser -a recommended wavelength for realization of the SI (Système International d'Unités, or International System of Units) meter. NIST used the C-AFM to participate in this comparison.ASM used a commercially available AFM with an open-loop scanner, calibrated by a 144 nm pitch transfer standard. In a prior collaboration with Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), the German national metrology institute, ASM's transfer standard was calibrated using PTB's traceable optical diffractometry instrument. Thus, ASM's measurements are also traceable to the SI meter.NMC/A*STAR used a large scanning range metrological atomic force microscope (LRM-AFM). The LRM-AFM integrates an AFM scanning head into a nano-stage equipped with three built-in He-Ne laser interferometers so that its measurement related to the motion on all three axes is directly traceable to the SI meter.The measurements for this interlaboratory comparison have been completed and the results are in agreement within their expanded uncertainties and at the level of a few parts in 10 4 .

Comparison of line width calibration using critical dimension atomic force microscopes between PTB and NIST

“…International comparisons between NMIs are an important activity both for fundamental measurement science and to validate metrological equivalence in support of the mutual recognition arrangement (MRA) that exists among participating NMIs [41]. Some of these comparisons have involved more than 10 participants [19,20], but others have involved just two or three laboratories [42][43][44]. In the field of nanometrology, performing large scale comparisons of linewidth measurements among NMIs has been especially challenging due to the use of multiple measurement technologies for relevant applications and the need to carefully define and thoroughly specify the measurand.…”

Roadmap for traceable calibration of a 5-nm pitch length standard

“…Detailed results will be presented later showing that all three labs' results for mean pitch agreed within a few parts in 10,000. 16 We believe that any high-quality, general purpose SEM or AFM may be capable of providing metrology at this level when combined with our method of systematic data capture and image analysis. A necessary requirement is short-term measurement precision, within single images.…”

Demystifying data evaluation in the measurement of periodic structures

“…Next class of methods is based on the spectral density of spatial frequencies that can be obtained using FT. A 1D or 2D discrete FT (DFT) is run on the measured topography and from the frequencies corresponding to the peaks the period is evaluated [41,45]. As the lateral size of the scan is limited, the frequency resolution can be very coarse, which can be handled using different approaches for calculating a refined FT [35,46], e.g.…”