Interfaith Marriage: Subjectivity of the Judge in Determination of No. 454/pdt.p/2018 Surakarta District Court

Farid, Diana; Pakarti, Muhammad Husni Abdulah; Hendriana, Hendriana; Fathiah, Iffah

doi:10.29240/jhi.v7i2.4574

Cited by 9 publications

(9 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Sebaliknya, konsep keberagaman dikaitkan dengan ciptaan Tuhan, yang berfungsi sebagai elemen penting bagi keberadaan manusia. Gagasan ini menjadi jelas ketika mempertimbangkan manifestasi fisik dari keberagaman, terutama di negara-negara yang memiliki latar belakang budaya yang beragam (Farid, 2022), seperti negara kita sendiri, Indonesia. Dalam konteks interaksi sosial, individu-individu dari berbagai latar belakang terlibat satu sama lain, sehingga menumbuhkan rasa saling memperhatikan (Harrington, 2019).…”

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Keabsahan Perkawinan Beda Agama Ada Di Tangan Hakim?

Mudakir

2024

awtjhpsa

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research explores the controversy that still occurs surrounding the Judge's approval in registering marriages between individuals of different religions, even though many religions and laws prohibit interfaith marriages. This research seeks to analyze the factors that are taken into consideration by judges in their decisions, in accordance with relevant laws and regulations in marriage law and the KHI (Compilation of Islamic Law). The research method used is qualitative, especially library research. This approach uses a normative legal approach as an analytical tool which aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of existing problems. The findings of this research highlight the important role of judges in determining the validity of interfaith marriages. Decision Number 508/Pdt.P/2022/PN JKT.SEL was granted, while Decision Number 71/Pdt.P/2017/PN Bla was rejected. The judge's interpretation of Article 2 paragraph (1) of the Marriage Law plays an important role in the validity of interfaith marriages, even though there are quite significant differences with the Compilation of Islamic Law.

show abstract

Section: Pendahuluanunclassified

Keabsahan Perkawinan Beda Agama Ada Di Tangan Hakim?

Mudakir

2024

awtjhpsa

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, the determination of interfaith marriage tends to be limited to the subjectivity of the judge in interpreting Article 2 (1) of Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage (Farid et al, 2022;Hariyanto et al, 2021). Decisions regarding interfaith marriage should aim at achieving lasting peace and justice not only for the parties involved, but also for the wider community or the majority of the Muslim community in Indonesia (Gemilang et al, 2023).…”

Section: Interfaith Marriage In Indonesiamentioning

confidence: 99%

Islamic Law, the State, and Human Rights: The Contestation of Interfaith Marriage Discourse on Social Media in Indonesia

Sonafist,

Yuningsih

2023

JURIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed at explaining the contestation of interfaith marriage discourse on social media, specifically on Instagram. The issue of interfaith marriage was quickly responded by social media users, not only by posting on their own accounts, but also by commenting on those posts of other people’s accounts. This study attempted to map Instagram media users’ comments on posts about interfaith marriage and to see the contestation of these comments in the context of the discourse on Islamic law, the state, and human rights in Indonesia. Qualitative research method was used in conducting this study. Data were collected from netizens’ comments on the issue of interfaith marriage, specifically the issue of interfaith marriage conducted by a member of Presidential Special Staff, the District Court’s decision on granting the interfaith marriage, and the Supreme Court’s circular on interfaith marriage. These comments were randomly selected and then analyzed using qualitative content analysis methods. This study found that: first, there were two response models for social media users when commenting on the issue of interfaith marriage on Instagram, they were the responses of acceptance and rejection. The narrative of the comments that accepted the idea of interfaith marriage emphasized human rights, diversity, freedom, and criticized the state’s involvement in private matters. Meanwhile, the narrative of comments that rejected the idea of interfaith marriage mostly refered to the provisions of Islamic law and state law. Second, based on these two response models, there was a contestation over the discourse of interfaith marriage in the context of Islamic law, the state, and human rights. However, this contestation was not based on a deep understanding of human rights and legal discourse. This contestation might have an impact on the public’s lack of legal understanding of interfaith marriage and had the potential to cause conflict on social media. This study confirmed that contestation of legal discourse came not only from people who had authority, but also from people who did not have in-depth legal knowledge.

show abstract

“…Dan apabila mempelai yang mengambil keputusan dengan mengikuti hukum perdata sipil maka pernikahan di perboleh kan dengan pertangung jawaban pasangan memiliki, hak dan kewajiban nya masing-masing contoh dalam hak asuh, hak waris dan hak kewajiban menafkahi (Jauhari, 2020;Verma, 2018). Indonesia memiliki hukum perdata yang memberikan perlindungan hukum yang sama bagi semua individu atau masyarakat nya tanpa memandang status agama yang di anutnya dalam sebuah pernikahan beda agama banyak faktor problematika yang harus dihadapi dengan harus di pikirkan secara matang-matang contoh permasalah memilih agama sang anak.dan hak waris ketika sang anak berusia 17 tahun dia akan resmi memilih agama yang akan dianutnya masyarakat Indonesia memiliki hak atas beragama yang sesuai dengan pacasila sila pertama yaitu ketuhanan yang maha esa (Farid, 2022;Kadir, 2023;Koschorke, 2019).…”

Section: Hasil Dan Pembahasanunclassified

Analisis Pernikahan Beda Agama tentang Pandangan Hukum Positif Agama dan Sosiologi

Arief,

Yohanes,

Setiawan

et al. 2023

ijlj

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Marriage is a bond of agreement between human individuals to build a household ship with a happy and eternal goal until the end of their life. In a marriage, there are many factors supporting similarities, differences, economics, religion, social status and so on. Our aim is to research to find out whether it is permissible to marry religious differences are in accordance with the results of the methodology that we are looking for, namely in accordance with the perfective Indonesian positive law, religious law and sociological views on interfaith marriages. Indonesia has its own regulations which are regulated in its law book in the Civil Code, while according to the perspective of religious law in Indonesia, marriages from people of different religions are not allowed, they are considered invalid or forbidden, the sociological view of marriages between different religions is considered valid. Just because in social science a marriage occurs because of mutual love and does not prioritize religion because love occurs because there are similarities and differences that complement each other and there is an attitude of tolerance between partners so that the marriage is eternal and happy.

show abstract

Interfaith Marriage: Subjectivity of the Judge in Determination of No. 454/pdt.p/2018 Surakarta District Court

Cited by 9 publications

References 0 publications

Keabsahan Perkawinan Beda Agama Ada Di Tangan Hakim?

Keabsahan Perkawinan Beda Agama Ada Di Tangan Hakim?

Islamic Law, the State, and Human Rights: The Contestation of Interfaith Marriage Discourse on Social Media in Indonesia

Analisis Pernikahan Beda Agama tentang Pandangan Hukum Positif Agama dan Sosiologi

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About