Double Disillusion: The 2016 Australian Federal Election 2018
DOI: 10.22459/dd.04.2018.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interest Groups and the Election

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 12. While covering countries for whom such elite-level data have not been compiled (neither for groups nor for parties), targeting organizational elites specifically is in line with state-of-the-art group research recognizing these actors (as compared to individual members or experts) as most knowledgeable about the range of intra-organizational aspects covered (Beyers et al, 2016; Halpin and Fraussen, 2015). Note that as the organization was the ‘unit of analysis’, where several email contacts were available for one organization, those were used successively until a survey for the respective organization was returned. …”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“… 12. While covering countries for whom such elite-level data have not been compiled (neither for groups nor for parties), targeting organizational elites specifically is in line with state-of-the-art group research recognizing these actors (as compared to individual members or experts) as most knowledgeable about the range of intra-organizational aspects covered (Beyers et al, 2016; Halpin and Fraussen, 2015). Note that as the organization was the ‘unit of analysis’, where several email contacts were available for one organization, those were used successively until a survey for the respective organization was returned. …”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“… 13. The survey was composed to the extent possible of questions drawn from various surveys such as by Beyers et al (2016), INTERARENA (http://interarena.dk/Default.asp?l=eng) and Halpin and Fraussen (2015) (partially adapted to make the questions applicable to the different organizations covered). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation