2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11357-012-9445-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactive effects of sex, social environment, dietary restriction, and methionine on survival and reproduction in fruit flies

Abstract: For the evolution of life histories, the trade-off between survival and reproduction is fundamental. Because sexes optimize fitness in different ways, this trade-off is expected to be resolved differently by males and females. Consequently, the sexes are predicted to respond differently to changes in resource availability. In fruit flies, research on dietary restriction has focused largely on females maintained in the absence of males, thereby neglecting sexual interactions that affect reproductive behavior of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
58
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is important to note that the lack of detectable costs in this study may reflect the fact that costs could lie in other unmeasured aspects of fly reproductive performance (i.e., offspring quality). Furthermore, at least one follow-up study has reported contrasting effects of methionine, showing that this amino acid reduced LS but had little effect on reproduction (Zajitschek et al ., 2013). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is important to note that the lack of detectable costs in this study may reflect the fact that costs could lie in other unmeasured aspects of fly reproductive performance (i.e., offspring quality). Furthermore, at least one follow-up study has reported contrasting effects of methionine, showing that this amino acid reduced LS but had little effect on reproduction (Zajitschek et al ., 2013). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, it is now accepted that, the caloric content being constant, the proteins/carbohydrates ratio modulates lifespan, for instance in Drosophila melanogaster flies (e.g. Vigne and Frelin, 2007ab, Lee et al, 2008, Bruce et al, 2013, Zajitschek et al, 2013 and in mice (Solon-Biet et al, 2014). Therefore, the mainstream hypothesis to explain the positive effect of dietary restriction (DR) on lifespan, when observed, is now more subtle than it was, because it deals with the ratio of nutrients rather than simply with the number of calories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly, some authors have modified the protein:carbohydrate (P:C) ratio by restricting live yeast, a source of proteins (Chippindale et al, 1993, Le Bourg and Minois, 1996, Le Bourg and Le Rohellec, 2009, or by varying the quantity of amino acids (e.g. Zajitschek et al, 2013) or of dead yeast (e.g. Frelin, 2007ab, Zajitschek et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supplementation with all kinds of amino acids or essential amino acids suppresses DR-promoted longevity. Methionine restriction also causes a slight decrease in the average lifespan without affecting reproductive fitness in Drosophila [54]. Thus, other amino acids have a role in lifespan regulation.…”
Section: Role Of Specific Amino Acids In Longevitymentioning
confidence: 99%