1996
DOI: 10.1063/1.117441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Interactions of ion-implantation-induced interstitials with boron at high concentrations in silicon

Abstract: Ion implantation of Si (60 keV, 1×1014/cm2) has been used to introduce excess interstitials into silicon predoped with high background concentrations of B, which were varied between 1×1018 and 1×1019/cm3. Following post-implantation annealing at 740 °C for 15 min to allow agglomeration of the available interstitials into elongated {311} defects, the density of the agglomerated interstitials was determined by plan-view transmission electron microscopy observation of the defects. We report a significant reductio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

12
36
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
12
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…74 In addition, a proper substitutional B concentration was demonstrated to suppress the typical {311} defects, by a competitive BIC formation. 75 The phenomenon of B-I clustering has a clear negative drawback as far as the dopant activation is concerned, but in addition, it has a weighty effect on the B diffusion process and on its simulation. In fact, B-I clustering affects the migration events not only because diffusing B atoms are trapped and later on de-trapped once BICs dissolve but also for the reason that the Si self-interstitial density is modified during BIC formation and dissolution, by Is hold and release processes from BICs.…”
Section: B-i Clusters Formation and Dissolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…74 In addition, a proper substitutional B concentration was demonstrated to suppress the typical {311} defects, by a competitive BIC formation. 75 The phenomenon of B-I clustering has a clear negative drawback as far as the dopant activation is concerned, but in addition, it has a weighty effect on the B diffusion process and on its simulation. In fact, B-I clustering affects the migration events not only because diffusing B atoms are trapped and later on de-trapped once BICs dissolve but also for the reason that the Si self-interstitial density is modified during BIC formation and dissolution, by Is hold and release processes from BICs.…”
Section: B-i Clusters Formation and Dissolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that the prolonged anneal may lead to a state where the surrounding strain is reduced as the RLDs further develop and is not sufficient to assist exciton recombination at the defect sites. Finally, processes competing with luminescence from {311} defects such as other nonradiative recombination centers associated with irradiation damage 20 , quenching by dopant effects and trapping of impurities at defects 25,26 may play an important role, especially at long annealing times. For example, gettering of (metal) impurities to dislocations has previously been suggested as a possible cause for observed changes in band-edge luminescence.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The B hump centered in the end-of-range ͑EOR͒ region was observed by many authors, 4,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22] though the microstructure and kinetics of it still remains controversial. [21][22][23][24][25][26] The amorphous/crystalline ͑a/c͒ interfaces predicted by the TA-MIX simulations are also shown in Fig. 5, which are within the vicinity of the B humps respectively.…”
Section: Effects Of Anneal Ge Dose and Ge Energymentioning
confidence: 96%