Inter-organizational Cooperation in Swiss eGovernment

Neuroni, Alessia; Fraefel, Marianne; Riedl, Reinhard

doi:10.1007/978-3-642-22878-0_22

Cited by 6 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 10 publications

(22 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These studies highlight that egovernment implementation requires coordination and cooperation at all levels of government, and with employees, businesses, and citizens. Cooperation among the actors can be become a solution to overcoming the constraints imposed by lack of resources in an egovernment implementation by providing opportunities to share across agencies (Scholl & Klischewski, 2007) and to determine rules that govern their relationship (Neuroni et al, 2011). Cooperation also allows government employees to gain external input relating to knowledge and skills that can help them to ease implementation.…”

Section: Coordination and Cooperation In E-government Implementationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Coordination and Cooperation in E‐Government: An Indonesian Local E‐Government Case

Nurdin

Stockdale

Scheepers

2014

E J Info Sys Dev Countries

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The implementation of e‐government systems often involves many different agencies and actors. Their different characteristics and the need to work together make the relationships between them complex. Coordination and cooperation have become important issues in harmonizing the many actors that support the implementation of e‐government systems. This study examines how coordination and cooperation shape the implementation process of local e‐government systems that may be acquired or developed internally. A case study of local egovernment systems implementation in Indonesia is presented and analyzed from the perspectives of coordination and cooperation between internal and external actors and agencies. Our findings suggest that dynamic coordination and cooperation have influenced the success of e‐government systems implementation at local government (regency) level in Bali, Indonesia. The regency practiced coordination and cooperation, both vertically and horizontally, with central government agencies, other regencies, private companies, and with internal institutions. The ability of the regency to gain from these practices offers insights into e‐government implementation for other local governments.

show abstract

Section: Coordination and Cooperation In E-government Implementationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Coordination and Cooperation in E‐Government: An Indonesian Local E‐Government Case

Nurdin

Stockdale

Scheepers

2014

E J Info Sys Dev Countries

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Data-exchange infrastructures enabling inter-agency collaboration [24] in OOP contexts (i.e. sharing and re-using personal and sensitive data of citizens or business) provide the foundations for interoperable and re-usable solutions of seamless public service provisioning.…”

Section: Data As An Infrastructure Asset In the Public Sectormentioning

confidence: 99%

Approaches to Good Data Governance in Support of Public Sector Transformation Through Once-Only

Wimmer¹,

Neuroni²,

Frecè³

2020

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Once Only Principle (OOP) drives current public sector modernization through the reduction of administrative burdens. It requires public authorities not to ask citizens and companies to repeatedly provide information to the public authorities. Instead, public authorities shall share and re-use data among themselves in due respect of data protection regulation. The sharing and re-use of sensitive and non-sensitive data among public administrations demands for broad acceptance by all stakeholders. Trust and transparency are key success criteria in such data-driven public sector transformation. Establishing proper governance mechanisms for the data infrastructures that enable the sharing and reuse in public service provisioning, and that provide the necessary transparency and trust levels is expected to effectively improve public service. This research investigates approaches for establishing a good data governance in OOP settings tackling the sharing and re-use of sensitive or personal data. Geographical focus is on the European Union and Switzerland.

show abstract

“…There is no doubt that seizing the benefits from data driven innovation requires the willingness to collaborate. In order to create public and economic value, incentive systems for cooperation and collective action need to be developed, covering the entire data life-cycle [3,11,32,47,50]. Coherent policies are needed to encourage investments, promote sharing and reuse, and reduce barriers to cross-border flows that could interrupt global data value chains [41,42].…”

Section: Data Governance At the Societal Levelmentioning

confidence: 99%

Conceptualizing a national data infrastructure for Switzerland

Estermann¹,

Fraefel²,

Neuroni³

et al. 2018

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A national data infrastructure (NDI) provides data, data-related services and guidelines for the re-use of data to individuals and organizations. It facilitates efficient sharing of data, supports new business models, and is thus a key enabler for the digital economy, open research, societal collaboration and political processes. While several European countries have taken steps to set up data infrastructures cutting across institutional silos, approaches vary, and there is no common understanding of what a NDI exactly comprises. In Switzerland, activities are still at a conceptual stage. In order to foster a shared vision of what a NDI is about, stakeholder interviews were carried out with representatives of public administration, research, civil society, and the private sector. There is broad consensus among key stakeholders that a NDI is to be conceived as a nationwide distributed technical infrastructure allowing the sharing of data, based on predefined rules. Our findings also suggest that the notion of a NDI should be approached from four perspectives: a big data, a base register, an open data, and a mydata perspective. For its implementation, effective coordination across several dimensions (ethical, legal, political, economical, organizational, semantical, and technical) is crucial, which calls for a truly multidisciplinary approach.

show abstract

Inter-organizational Cooperation in Swiss eGovernment

Cited by 6 publications

References 10 publications

Coordination and Cooperation in E‐Government: An Indonesian Local E‐Government Case

Coordination and Cooperation in E‐Government: An Indonesian Local E‐Government Case

Approaches to Good Data Governance in Support of Public Sector Transformation Through Once-Only

Conceptualizing a national data infrastructure for Switzerland

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About