2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2018.10.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-comparison of satellite-retrieved and Global Land Data Assimilation System-simulated soil moisture datasets for global drought analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 101 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Earth System Science Data to measure extremely dry or extremely wet conditions (McColl et al, 2017;Liu et al, 2019); consequently, this lack of information influences the prediction capacity of our downscaling framework and there is a need to improve modeling and measurements of these extremes. In addition, the quality of the prediction factors will impact the quality of final prediction outcomes.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Earth System Science Data to measure extremely dry or extremely wet conditions (McColl et al, 2017;Liu et al, 2019); consequently, this lack of information influences the prediction capacity of our downscaling framework and there is a need to improve modeling and measurements of these extremes. In addition, the quality of the prediction factors will impact the quality of final prediction outcomes.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This scale mismatch has been previously identified when testing different soil moisture patterns (Nicolai-Shaw et al, 2015) as field soil moisture records are usually representative of <1 m 3 of soil while satellite and modeling estimates varies from several meters to multiple kilometers. Soil moisture measurements (from satellites and in situ measurements) across both water-limited environment and tropical areas are extremely limited (Liu et al, 2019), a condition that increases prediction variances (and consequently https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2020-264 also increased model uncertainty). Thus, alternative modeling and evaluation frameworks and model evaluation statistics are required to provide more information to better interpret the spatial variability and dynamics of soil moisture global estimates (Gruber et al, 2020).…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4). This subestimation, as explained in previous work (McColl et al, 2017, Liu et al, 2019, is because satellite soil moisture sensors are not able to provide accurate estimates across extremely dry conditions or across areas where water aboveground is higher than water belowground (e.g., extremely humid conditions). For a better calibration and understanding the main limitations of satellite soil moisture measurements across multiple environmental conditions, there is an increasing number of studies reporting validation performances across multiple scales (spatial and temporal) of available soil moisture satellite datasets (An et al, 2016;Colliander et al, 2017b;Dorigo et al, 2011b;Minet et al, 2012;Mohanty et al, 2017;Yee et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…1). Water limited environments across arid and semi-arid regions where drying trends are prevalent, large discrepancy has been found between satellite and model-based soil moisture estimates (Liu et al, 2019). The lack of field soil moisture information across these areas is a major limitation for interpreting the discrepancies between satellite and model-based soil moisture estimates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation