2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2020.100730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inter-comparison of lumped hydrological models in data-scarce watersheds using different precipitation forcing data sets: Case study of Northern Ontario, Canada

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on a multi-model approach composed of four gHMs (DBH, H08, LPJml, and PCR-GLOBWB) and two rHMs (GR4J and HMETS) driven by multiple forcing meteorological datasets over 198 large-sized NA catchments for the 1971-2010 period, this study aims at contributing to the ISIMIP2a topic for operational use purposes by: (1) assessing the gHMs' performance in terms of simulating seasonal flow dynamics; (2) comparing the gHMs' performance with that of the rHMs; and (3) based on ( 1) and ( 2), exploring the influence of the global driving datasets and catchment characteristics on gHM performance. The four gHMs are selected as they contain the varsoc socio-economic scenario for multiple forcing meteorological datasets over NA; the selected rHMs usually display reliable accuracy in data-deficient conditions due to their quite simple and parsimonious structure [36,37]. Overall, this work provides key information for subsequent impact studies, supporting decision-making based on the gHMs for the NA region covered by the global ISIMIP2 domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Based on a multi-model approach composed of four gHMs (DBH, H08, LPJml, and PCR-GLOBWB) and two rHMs (GR4J and HMETS) driven by multiple forcing meteorological datasets over 198 large-sized NA catchments for the 1971-2010 period, this study aims at contributing to the ISIMIP2a topic for operational use purposes by: (1) assessing the gHMs' performance in terms of simulating seasonal flow dynamics; (2) comparing the gHMs' performance with that of the rHMs; and (3) based on ( 1) and ( 2), exploring the influence of the global driving datasets and catchment characteristics on gHM performance. The four gHMs are selected as they contain the varsoc socio-economic scenario for multiple forcing meteorological datasets over NA; the selected rHMs usually display reliable accuracy in data-deficient conditions due to their quite simple and parsimonious structure [36,37]. Overall, this work provides key information for subsequent impact studies, supporting decision-making based on the gHMs for the NA region covered by the global ISIMIP2 domain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…HEC-HMS model is a flexible hydrological model with particular physical significance designed to simulate a comprehensive range of hydrological processes coupled with a very sophisticated graphical user interface [18]. Modified melting rates have been used by many studies, using the hypothetical ATIMR (antecedent temperature index-melt rate) function used in the snowmelt module of HEC-HMS during calibration [19][20][21][22]; however, a commonly observed shortcoming in published literature is that no particular data is used to directly estimate the ATIMR curve. Therefore, its estimation and application to a mountainous basin with flow sources of complex composition is noteworthy here [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydrological model can be categorized as a lumped model, semi-distributed model, and fully distributed model. The various hydrological models have been designed with different hydrological processes represented by mathematical equations [20,5,18,8]. Hydrological models were developed at least 50 years ago to study hydrological behavior or to manage them [30,23,4,24,7,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%