1985
DOI: 10.1016/0346-251x(85)90002-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Intelligent call and the qwerty phenomenon: A rationale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In all, dynamic interaction by the learner with the machine is a far cry from the postulated habit-formation of programmed instruction which informed the theory for early attempts at CALl (cf. Phillips 1985). Burkhardt and Frazer (undated: 35) point to the basic tension between the range and flexibility of program design options and their simplicity and clarity.…”
Section: Theoretical Justificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In all, dynamic interaction by the learner with the machine is a far cry from the postulated habit-formation of programmed instruction which informed the theory for early attempts at CALl (cf. Phillips 1985). Burkhardt and Frazer (undated: 35) point to the basic tension between the range and flexibility of program design options and their simplicity and clarity.…”
Section: Theoretical Justificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these were initially designed for CAl, both authors plan to refine their systems in order to be able to parse whole texts for purposes of research. student's learning environment can be enriched by making him teach the machine, using AI techniques (so also Phillips 1985;Paramskas 1986).…”
Section: Extant Latin Coursewarementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some suggested that with the help of future advances in artificial intelligence, computers one day would be capable of communicating as unrestrictedly as humans (cf. Phillips 1985); others, however, have cautioned that computers should be used for tasks that they can perform better than humans (Jones 1991) or that intelligent CALL is only possible if language teaching is based on a narrow view of language as a system of grammar and vocabulary (Nyns 1989). Both realistic and unrealistic expectations for intelligent CALL are reviewed by Hagen (1995).…”
Section: Intelligent Call and Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of its flexibility CALL can easily be adapted to individualized study, pair work, group or class activities. But the major advantage of CALL probably lies in its interactiveness (Phillips, 1983;Schneider, 1983). Language learning should ideally be based on interaction in the real environment, and the computer can be used to help create such an environment for both man-machine and man-man interaction, stimulating the learner to use the language.…”
Section: Computer-assisted Language Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%