Intellectual Property Rights and Chinese Tradition Section: Philosophical Foundations

Abstract

Western attempts to obtain Chinese compliance with intellectual property rights have a long history of failure. Most discussions of the problem focus on either legal comparisons or explanations arising from levels of economic development (based primarily on the example of U.S. disregard for such rights during the 18th and 19th centuries). After decades of heated negotiation, intellectual property rights is still one of the major issues of misunderstanding between the West and the various Chinese political entities. This paper examines the sources of this problem from the standpoint of traditional Chinese social and political philosophy (specifically Neo-Confucianism). It points out that the basic assumptions about the nature of intellectual property, which arose during the 17th and 18th centuries in Europe, are fundamentally at odds with the traditional Chinese view of the role of intellectuals in society. It suggests that policies which do not take these differences into account, but which attempt to transfer Western legal concepts without the underlying social constructs are responsible for much of the lack of success in the area of intellectual property rights. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006China, intellectual property rights, Neo-Confucianism, confucian ethics, Chinese ethics, copyright,

Dissemination of knowledge on health: multiple resources and multiple steps

“…Now we would like to cite Dr Lehman, 8 who studied the Chinese view on intellectual property rights and its relation with Confucian ethics. In Chinese culture, knowledge is to be shared.…”

Confucius, Cars, and Big Government: Impact of Government Involvement in Business on Consumer Perceptions Under Confucianism

“…He found that there were some similarities with Western business ethics, but that Confucian ethics differed in that it placed more of a highlight on hierarchy, personal relations, traditions, and harmony. Lehman (2006) examined the impact of Neo-Confucian thought on the issue of intellectual property rights, and found that they were not supportive of Western-style practices in this area. In a study of whistle blowing in Korean culture, Park et al (2005) found that some aspects of Confucian ethics supported it, whereas other aspects worked against it.…”

“…In neo-Confucian thought, there was a strict division of society. There were scholars, farmers, artisans, and merchants (Lehman, 2006). Although these social classes were permeable and so different from those in Europe, those in one class were expected to fulfill their roles.…”

Reflecting on the Common Discourse on Piracy and Intellectual Property Rights: A Divergent Perspective

“…In fact, this was considered unethical, or at least was not supposed to be done overtly. Instead, it should be done for the sake of self-development, edification and societal benefit (Alford, 1993;Lehman, 2006). In fact, in traditional Confucian society, 'profit had been seen as characteristics of ''an inferior person'' (xiao-ren) who acts out of self interest and not principle' (Lehman, 2006, p. 6).…”