2007
DOI: 10.1117/1.2432143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration technologies for pluggable backplane optical interconnect systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These are 1) hollow metal waveguides (HMWG) [12] and 2) non-polarizing pellicle beamsplitters (NPPBS). These components will be described here in detail.…”
Section: Novel Low-cost Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These are 1) hollow metal waveguides (HMWG) [12] and 2) non-polarizing pellicle beamsplitters (NPPBS). These components will be described here in detail.…”
Section: Novel Low-cost Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theoretical loss of these hollow metal waveguides was estimated by Marcatili [12] for circular metallic waveguides.…”
Section: Novel Low-cost Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the guided-wave approach offers excellent interconnect path stability, low cost processing (ie., polymer waveguides) and are suitable for multi-drop interconnect architectures. However, a major obstacle in guided-wave techniques is the need of 90° out of plane optical deflectors to couple light into or out of the interconnecting waveguides (Glebov, et al, 2007). Such micro-mirrors suffer from reflection losses (i.e., 0.5 dB) due to roughness of diced surface and absorption and scattering of the metal film.…”
Section: Array Waveguide Evanescent Coupler Ribbonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A shared bus topology, which has been widely used in conventional electronic backplanes, can effectively multicast signals to all plug-in cards. There has been a lot of research work about optical shared bus topologies for card-to-backplane optical interconnect [2][3][4], but most of them set a fixed power distribution to each link after devices fabrication. So they are not energy efficient since they consume optical signal power even when cards are not plugged into the backplane.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%