2022
DOI: 10.3390/heritage5030080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integration of Laser Scanner, Ground-Penetrating Radar, 3D Models and Mixed Reality for Artistic, Archaeological and Cultural Heritage Dissemination

Abstract: Three-dimensional digital acquisition techniques can be useful in archaeology because they make a further technological contribution to the visualization of finds and structures. The possibility of integrating three-dimensional models from different acquisition systems (laser scanner, UAV, reflex and Georadar) is even more exciting. One of the peculiarities of these integration techniques is the possibility of promoting the dissemination of knowledge through virtual reality, augmented reality and mixed reality… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The four elements mentioned in DEM shallow analysis (nn. [3][4][5][6] are partially connected to the GPR anomalies in depth, supporting the hypothesis of the presence of walls. In addition, the wall section n. 3 seems to join up with the point where an abrupt variation in the wall stratigraphy is noted on the wall of the left aisle and, at the specular point on the right aisle, the GPR results show a probable similar variation in the wall texture (Figure 21).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The four elements mentioned in DEM shallow analysis (nn. [3][4][5][6] are partially connected to the GPR anomalies in depth, supporting the hypothesis of the presence of walls. In addition, the wall section n. 3 seems to join up with the point where an abrupt variation in the wall stratigraphy is noted on the wall of the left aisle and, at the specular point on the right aisle, the GPR results show a probable similar variation in the wall texture (Figure 21).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…It follows that collaborative work among heterogeneous teams with different types of expertise is required. In recent years, the use of non-invasive geomatic and geophysical techniques has assumed an increasingly important role in the field of cultural heritage [1][2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it is shown in Figure 33 we determined the wall thickness by drawing cross sections. The difference between the wall thickness emerged between 0.0117 and 0.05 m. It is commonly acknowledged that cutting-edge technology is essential for studying and recording architectural history (Barrile et al, 2022). The standards of representation and correctness of the finished output can be effectively improved by integrating several approaches (Valenti and Paternò, 2019).…”
Section: Results Results Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its application in documenting buildings and artifacts brings notable benefits, enabling rapid assessment of conservation states and formulating solutions to existing challenges [13]. On the other hand, 3D laser scanning, used for acquiring point cloud data, offers varied platforms like airborne laser scanning (ALS), terrestrial laser scanning (TLS), mobile laser scanning (MLS), and handheld laser scanning [14] to capture heritage data across different scales [15].…”
Section: Of 21mentioning
confidence: 99%