2010
DOI: 10.1109/tpc.2010.2077413
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrating an Executive Panel on Communication info an Engineering Curriculum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Through self assessment surveys from various engineering programs which contain feedback from industrial contacts and alumni, (Ohio State University (OSU), 2006; Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI), 2002), it is apparent that students graduate with the fundamental knowledge of their discipline, but there are weaknesses associated with formulating and solving problems, effective communication (Norback et al, 2010), understanding societal issues, and professional ethics (an example is presented in Table 3 -the bolded text indicates significant differences for key program objectives). The results from these recent self assessment surveys complement a skills ranking survey presented by Valenti (1996), as shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: How Well Are the Students Prepared At Graduation?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through self assessment surveys from various engineering programs which contain feedback from industrial contacts and alumni, (Ohio State University (OSU), 2006; Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI), 2002), it is apparent that students graduate with the fundamental knowledge of their discipline, but there are weaknesses associated with formulating and solving problems, effective communication (Norback et al, 2010), understanding societal issues, and professional ethics (an example is presented in Table 3 -the bolded text indicates significant differences for key program objectives). The results from these recent self assessment surveys complement a skills ranking survey presented by Valenti (1996), as shown in Figure 2.…”
Section: How Well Are the Students Prepared At Graduation?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A seguir apresenta-se alguns exemplos de como estruturado o curso de Engenharia de Produção em diferentes países. Norback et al(2010), Kennedy (1996) No Canadá os cursos de engenharia de produção (Alsaidan & Zhang, 2017) (Vaughter et al, 2016) seguem uma estrutura similar à dos melhores dos Estados Unidos (Dmochowski et al, 2016), com o diferencial de que possuírem em sua ementa disciplinas voltadas a diversos fatores humanos, como psicológicos, percepção sensorial, desempenho humano em funções específicas, habilidade de processamento de informações por pessoas e comportamento das pessoas. Através desses estudos pode-se, por exemplo, dizer onde os botões de um painel de controle devem ser alocados para a diminuição da chance de erro humano.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…Um grafo consegue ligar conhecimento (Khan, Ma, & Hardas, 2007) A primeira etapa foi conduzida através de uma revisão sistemática da literatura de acordo com as definições de ALDERSON et al (2004), COOK et al (1995 e WRIGHT et al (2007). Foram utilizados métodos explícitos para identificar, selecionar e incluir estudos conforme critérios predefinidos, e na sequencia os resultados dos estudos foram integrados e comparados, conforme sugerido por LIBERATI et al (2009) e MOHER et al (2009). A revisão sistemática foi realizada em três estágios que compreendem: 1) Planejamento; 2) Condução; e, 3) Apresentação dos resultados.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…There are some investigations based on just one type of engineering discipline (American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2011;Conrad, 2017). Other studies available are limited to the perspectives of executives (Norback, Leeds, & Forehand, 2009;Norback et al, 2010), with the main focus on the hiring process and the early years of engineers at the workplace (Norback & Hardin, 2005). Nicometo et al (2010) summarized what can be considered the ideal engineering communication skills in the industry setting in three main themes: 1) the ability to effectively speak, write, and interact with audiences outside of engineers' specific discipline, work group, or focus; 2) the willingness and self-motivation to initiate communication with others, and to seek out resource information through informal interactions; and 3) the ability to listen carefully to others in order to do the best work and achieve results that are valued by different stakeholders (clients, managers, coworkers).…”
Section: Engineering Communication In the Workplacementioning
confidence: 99%