Integrated Water Resources Optimization Models: An Assessment of a Multidisciplinary Tool for Sustainable Water Resources Management Strategies

Abstract

Integrated water resources optimization models (IWROM) are tools that have been developed over the last decade for determining optimal water allocations among competing sectors. This article describes the state of the art of IWROMs. We illustrate the various approaches that have been taken to determine and maximize economic benefits of withdrawing water for various use categories in IWROM applications, including off‐stream human uses and in‐stream uses such as ecological flows. First, we describe the hydrologic simulators used in IWROM applications, and the mathematical methods used to solve the optimization problems. It is suggested that IWROMs (a) seek to model coupled human–nature relationships and mimic the impact of water resources management strategies on the environment at the basin scale; (b) allow for the simulation and assessment of economic policies and strategies on water resources management; (c) can support basin‐wide decision‐making; and (d) are particularly useful for water‐scarce regions. Finally, we have identify the need for improvements in (a) simulating biophysical systems; (b) handling model uncertainty; (c) inclusion of environmental flows and other relevant environmental factors through economic benefit functions; (d) accounting for social impacts related to shifts in water allocations among users; and (e) inclusion of stakeholders in the development of IWROMs.

Using Information-Gap Decision Theory for Water Resources Planning Under Severe Uncertainty

“…This approach includes the benefits of an integrated modelling framework (Collins and Ray 2009;Mayer and Muñoz-Hernandez 2009) and address the complexity of decision-making under severe uncertainty (Bates et al 2008;Lempert and Schlesinger 2000;NRC 2009; US Climate Change Science Program 2009). The potential for severely different weather patterns associated with climate change coupled with uncertain socio-economic futures forces water managers to be prepared for not only challenging supply/demand situations that have occurred in the past, but also the potential for far worse conditions in the future.…”

Control of tree water networks: A geometric programming approach

“…Additional term is added to the objective function penalizing demand shortage (12a) by associating the cost parameters . These parameters can be estimated from water‐price demand‐response models for different consumers and market models [ Harou et al ., ; Mayer and Muoz‐Hernandez , ]. Naturally, a trade‐off exists between cost of energy required to operate the system and the penalty for demand shedding, since operating the system to full capacity will induce higher energy losses in the system that will require increased pump operation.…”

Integrated economic models to support decisions on water pricing in biofuel production river basins: three case studies from Brazil

“…To this end, hydro‐economic optimization models are helpful because they are able to obtain the economical optimum as a solution, prescribing the most efficient strategies for water allocation from a societal point of view, while incorporating hydrological, environmental, and institutional constraints. These models have advanced rapidly over the last few years, and are expected to make a significant impact on conceptual approaches and water resources management practices …”

“…At the firm level, hydro‐economic models can support industry decisions to expand production or develop integrated technologies for generating value from by‐products with minimum environmental impact (alternatively, minimizing investment risk due to environmental regulations) . At basin and regional level, hydro‐economic models have been widely used to prescribe water allocation strategies from an economic perspective, and more recently they have been extended to incorporate environmental, institutional, and policy constraints . At national and international levels, CGEMs allow assessment of the impacts of different water management instruments on the economy as a whole.…”