2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.04.218
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Integrated flood hazard assessment based on spatial ordered weighted averaging method considering spatial heterogeneity of risk preference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
5

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
49
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Early studies on disaster risk assessment methods mainly focused on qualitative assessment methods, but due to the uncertainty of disaster assessment, the qualitative assessment could not meet the research needs; thus research gradually moved from qualitative methods to a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, or fully quantitative methods [17][18][19][20]. At present, risk assessments are based on four main methods: (1) Mathematical statistics, a method usually used to calculate the intensity and frequency of disaster occurrence from historical disaster data and loss data [21,22]; (2) an indicators system, which usually selects reasonable disaster indicators and determines the weight of each indicator to build a risk assessment model and then conduct a comprehensive risk assessment [8,[23][24][25][26]; (3) RS-GIS technique, in which the satellite remote sensing data are processed and analyzed to determine the flood area and disaster high-risk area with the help of GIS technology [27,28]; and (4) scenario simulation, a method that conducts hydrological and hydrodynamic models to simulate flood scenarios [29][30][31]. Lots of studies show that the second disaster risk assessment method can reflect the regional risk situation on a macro level, and it has been widely applied because it is simple to conduct.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Early studies on disaster risk assessment methods mainly focused on qualitative assessment methods, but due to the uncertainty of disaster assessment, the qualitative assessment could not meet the research needs; thus research gradually moved from qualitative methods to a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, or fully quantitative methods [17][18][19][20]. At present, risk assessments are based on four main methods: (1) Mathematical statistics, a method usually used to calculate the intensity and frequency of disaster occurrence from historical disaster data and loss data [21,22]; (2) an indicators system, which usually selects reasonable disaster indicators and determines the weight of each indicator to build a risk assessment model and then conduct a comprehensive risk assessment [8,[23][24][25][26]; (3) RS-GIS technique, in which the satellite remote sensing data are processed and analyzed to determine the flood area and disaster high-risk area with the help of GIS technology [27,28]; and (4) scenario simulation, a method that conducts hydrological and hydrodynamic models to simulate flood scenarios [29][30][31]. Lots of studies show that the second disaster risk assessment method can reflect the regional risk situation on a macro level, and it has been widely applied because it is simple to conduct.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In detail, the research and assessment result were divided into four types according to risk level in the Jiangsu province of China. Xiao, Yi and Tang (2017) made an assessment of flood prone areas which was of great importance for watershed management. Small wastewater treatment systems sustainability was evaluated by a composite indicator approach (Molinos-Senante, Gómez, Garrido-Baserba, Caballero, & Sala-Garrido, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current literature, one can find modified options and hybrid approaches, such as the fuzzy AHP [33] and Monte Carlo simulation-aided AHP (MC-AHP) [34], which have both been used in flood hazard assessment. AHP has also been integrated with a suitability assessment model to evaluate flood risks in a spatial manner [35].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%