“…Figure 1 depicts the flow diagram reporting the selection process. At the end of the screening process, 21 articles were included in the quantitative analysis [ 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 ]; however, because four papers reported separate data based on the adenoma site (colorectal, colon and rectal) [ 29 , 37 , 44 , 45 ], one paper reported the results for both incident and recurrent adenoma [ 37 ], another used a different control group (general population and hospital-based patients) [ 29 ], and two papers reported data stratified by sex [ 36 , 46 ], these were considered to be independent studies. Lastly, five studies [ 30 , 35 , 36 , 45 , 49 ] did not report the association between dietary fibre intake and colorectal adenoma as a risk, but as a number of events among those with higher and lower intake.…”