Institutional design and the accountability paradox: A case study of three Aboriginal accountability regimes in Canada

Abstract

While academic interest in accountability and transparency mechanisms in Aboriginal governance has risen over the past few years, very few studies have examined how these mechanisms operate in practice. One author, Shin Imai (), argues that Indigenous groups in Canada are faced with an accountability paradox that gives too much power to the federal government to intervene in band affairs, while giving too little power to band members to hold their local officials accountable for their actions. This paper examines the extent to which Aboriginal groups can avoid this paradox by reviewing three experiments in institutional design and self‐government in Aboriginal communities: the Sechelt Indian Band and the Westbank First Nation in British Columbia, and Nunatsiavut in Labrador. While considerable variation exists in terms of how well these communities overcome Imai's paradox, each community's accountability regime is an improvement over the one imposed by the Indian Act. The effectiveness of these regimes depends heavily on the institutional designs chosen by the Indigenous groups.

Mixing Politics and Business in the Canadian Arctic: Inuit Corporate Governance in Nunavik and the Inuvialuit Settlement Region

“…This paper relies on relevant secondary literature and an analysis of primary documents to describe and analyze these two Inuit regions and the governance activities that occur there. This approach is consistent with other published articles in the subfield (Alcantara et al, 2012; Kuokkanen, 2011; Macdonald, 2011).…”

Is Indigeneity like Ethnicity? Theorizing and Assessing Models of Indigenous Political Representation

“…There are, of course, additional elements of these principles and other ideas that need to be incorporated to build a theory of Indigenous representation that stands apart from theories of ethnic representation. Most notably, an autonomous theory of Indigenous representation also has to grapple with notions of accountability between governed and governors (Alcantara et al, 2012). The role federal political systems can play as either enablers or constrainers of different pathways to Indigenous representation also begs for additional reflection (Henderson, 1994; 2002; Papillon, 2012; Sabin, 2014; Davidson, 2018).…”

Trust, institutions, and indigenous self‐governance: An exploratory study

“…There are also First Nations who are choosing to develop institutions outside the self‐governance process, opting to achieve greater economic and political independence through business revenues (Alcantara, Spicer, & Leone, ), or developing their own institutions over issues important to them, without Canada, despite still being subject to the Indian Act (see the Haida Council at http://www.haidanation.ca).…”