Is Indigeneity like Ethnicity? Theorizing and Assessing Models of Indigenous Political Representation

Abstract

Within the broader literature on political representation, studies exploring Indigenous forms of representation are rather limited. Where they exist, they tend to explore how Western models of political representation include Indigenous peoples, conflating Indigenous groups with ethnic minorities. This article asks whether and how Indigenous political representation might be distinguished from the representation of ethnic minorities. Our argument is that Indigenous groups’ identities tend to be based on different claims and relationships to the state than ethnic groups, which leads to political mobilization seeking a means to respond to the colonial nation-state project. We develop a theoretical framework that identifies three principles that ought to inform an effective and legitimate model of Indigenous political representation: recognition, protection and decolonization. We then apply this theoretical framework to assess the extent to which existing models of Indigenous representation in Bolivia, Canada, New Zealand and Norway correspond with these three principles.

COVID‐19, nationalism, and the politics of crisis: A scholarly exchange

“…However, even if COVID‐19 does destabilize multinational states through national minority mobilization, this does not completely threaten the idea of the nation‐state. National minorities seeking independence are not working to undermine the international society of nation‐states; they are working to join it (Williams & Schertzer, 2019, p. 680).…”

Do Reserved Seats Work? Evidence from Tribal Representatives in Maine

“…A second body of research explores how descriptive representation is associated with substantive representation for groups such as African-Americans (Gay 2002;Swain 1993;Tate 2004), Latinos (Bratton 2006;Wallace 2014), women (Clark and Caro 2013;Swers 2005;Wängnerud 2009), and LGB people (Hansen and Treul 2015). Native Americans are featured less prominently in this literature (Williams and Schertzer 2019). Extant research examines the links between Indigenous constituents, party identification, and pro-Indigenous voting in Congress, finding that a higher percentage of constituents who are Native Americans, as well as the presence of a recognized tribe, are each associated with more pro-Indigenous voting behavior.…”

Influential choices: deconstructing operationalisations of Indigeneity in survey-based education research using an example from Peru

“…Indigeneity is a complex concept (Snipp, 2016). Literature on the subject showcases a myriad of possible aspects that can constitute Indigenous identity (Greene, 2016;Levi & Maybury-Lewis, 2012;Paredes, 2007;Vásquez Huamán et al, 2012;Walter & Andersen, 2013;Williams & Schertzer, 2019). The key markers, as synthesised by the United Nations (2004), include historical antecedence, occupation of ancestral land, ethnic identity, cultural distinctiveness (dress, lifestyle, community membership), language, self-identification, and nondominance in relation to a colonial nation state.…”