2010
DOI: 10.1117/12.865490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inspecting EUV mask blanks with a 193-nm system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This tool is the only blank inspection tool so far to support 3Xnm HP node from previous experiment and benchmarking. [7] …”
Section: Defect On Euv Mask and Inspection Toolmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This tool is the only blank inspection tool so far to support 3Xnm HP node from previous experiment and benchmarking. [7] …”
Section: Defect On Euv Mask and Inspection Toolmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The simulation results are compared with the inspection limits of current and future BI tools in figure 11. [7,11] Minimum printable defect size on the blank in SEVD is 23/15/13/9nm in 3X/22/16/11nm HP, respectively. It is considered that Teron BI systems (61X and 63X) can inspect printable defects down to 22nm HP node.…”
Section: Required Blank Inspection For Next Device Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] The implementation of the EUV lithography into the semiconductor industry is of concern because phase defects as small as 1 nm in height (or depth) being embedded in the mask blank are printable on wafers. To detect such printable phase defects on an EUVL mask blank, several kinds of non-actinic inspection techniques [4][5][6][7][8] and actinic inspection techniques [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] have been developed, and their inspection capabilities have been evaluated. Besides the development of the techniques for inspecting multilayercoated mask blank, an understanding of the impacts of the varying size phase defects printed on wafer is necessary in order to define critical defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%