2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2016.06.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Insight on the oxidation resistance of UO N layers: A density functional study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The strong on-site Coulomb repulsion among the localized U 5f electrons was described by using the Hubbard U correction (DFT + U ) developed by Dudarev et al, which has shown success in many U-based intermetallic alloys . It is well believed that an U eff value of >1.80 eV is necessary to accurately describe the structural and magnetic properties of uranium nitrogen compounds .…”
Section: Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The strong on-site Coulomb repulsion among the localized U 5f electrons was described by using the Hubbard U correction (DFT + U ) developed by Dudarev et al, which has shown success in many U-based intermetallic alloys . It is well believed that an U eff value of >1.80 eV is necessary to accurately describe the structural and magnetic properties of uranium nitrogen compounds .…”
Section: Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The strong on-site Coulomb repulsion among the localized U 5f electrons was described by using the Hubbard U correction (DFT + U) developed by Dudarev et al, 38 which has shown success in many U-based intermetallic alloys. 10 It is well believed that an U eff value of >1.80 eV is necessary to accurately describe the structural and magnetic properties of uranium nitrogen compounds. 39 In this paper, we used the Hubbard and exchange parameters of effective U of U eff = 4.0 eV for all the calculations, on the basis of the fact that the valence state of U atoms in UN is significantly lower than 3.0 using U eff = 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, and 6.0 eV, which is inconsistent with the formal valence state of U 3+ for UN.…”
Section: ■ Computational Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations