2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10972-012-9314-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inquiry-Based Instruction and Teaching About Nature of Science: Are They Happening?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
171
0
27

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 256 publications
(215 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
7
171
0
27
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies on scientific inquiry were about views and perceptions of either students or teachers towards scientific inquiry (Gaigher, Lederman & Lederman, 2014;Schwartz, Lederman & Lederman, 2008;Senler, 2015). Furthermore, many research studies on inquiry skills appeared to be dominated by a focus on classroom-based science investigations (Capps & Crawford, 2013;NRC, 2012). Chinn and Malhotra (2002) found that 'many scientific inquiry tasks given to students in schools do not reflect the core attributes of authentic scientific reasoning' (p. 176), and suggest that inquiry tasks should go beyond hands-on activities to also include evaluation of evidence, complex data and simulations.…”
Section: Scientific Reasoning and Scientific Inquirymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies on scientific inquiry were about views and perceptions of either students or teachers towards scientific inquiry (Gaigher, Lederman & Lederman, 2014;Schwartz, Lederman & Lederman, 2008;Senler, 2015). Furthermore, many research studies on inquiry skills appeared to be dominated by a focus on classroom-based science investigations (Capps & Crawford, 2013;NRC, 2012). Chinn and Malhotra (2002) found that 'many scientific inquiry tasks given to students in schools do not reflect the core attributes of authentic scientific reasoning' (p. 176), and suggest that inquiry tasks should go beyond hands-on activities to also include evaluation of evidence, complex data and simulations.…”
Section: Scientific Reasoning and Scientific Inquirymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No obstante, este es un enfoque que se concibe y desarrolla a través de diversas interpretaciones (Barrow, 2006;Couso, 2014). Numerosos estudios ponen de manifiesto los obstáculos y la complejidad que supone para los profesores (en activo y en formación) poner en práctica este enfoque de enseñanza y aprendizaje (Capps y Crawford, 2013;Gillies y Nichols, 2015;Ireland, Watters, Brownlee y Lupton, 2012;Vázquez-Alonso y Manassero-Mas, 2015;Yoon, Joung y Kim, 2012). Vázquez-Alonso y Manassero-Mas (2015) resumen en diez principios lo que debería guiar una propuesta de enseñanza de ciencias basada en la investigación para la formación inicial y la práctica docente.…”
Section: Marco De Referencia Teóricounclassified
“…Otros resultados resaltan la predominancia del enfoque tradicional de la evaluación del que parte el profesorado (Graham, 2005;Hargreaves, 2005;Pilitsis y Duncan, 2012;Wang et al 2010). Ello podría explicarse por la importante influencia de sus experiencias durante la escolaridad fuertemente caracterizada, en general, por una evaluación tradicional (Capps y Crawford, 2013;Graham, 2005;Maclellan, 2004;Porlán et al, 2011). Esto representa el punto de partida en la formación inicial para explicitar, analizar y poder contrastar estos planteamientos tradicionales, como se ha hecho en el programa formativo desarrollado.…”
Section: Conclusiones E Implicaciones Para La Formación Del Profesoradounclassified
“…As expressed by [15] thinks is a mental activity in order to formulate understanding, synthesize, and draw conclusions. [16] argues that thinking is an activity of the human person which lead to the invention directed to a destination.…”
Section: Critical Thinking Skills a Understanding Critical Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%