2020
DOI: 10.1108/jhti-12-2019-0134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovativeness and coopetition in tourism SMEs: comparing two coopetitive networks in Brazil

Abstract: PurposeThis research aims to analyze the relations between coopetition and innovation, by comparing two coopetitive tourism SMEs networks in Brazil.Design/methodology/approachThe first network comprises 23 SMEs in Honey Island, a natural reserve, and the second network comprises 21 out of 25 SMEs in the Campos Gerais region, recognized by its strong agribusiness. Innovativeness variables included innovation inputs, capabilities, and outputs; and four types of relations that foster innovation were considered, n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(132 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, their tolerance of the negative effects of tourism changes according to the situation of being native or one's length of the duration of living in the region. Considering the tourism destination has a complex structure and consists of various actors based on both mutual relationships and different interests (Woyo and Slabbert, 2019), policymakers should be aware of these differences and take them into consideration while developing plans, policies, strategies and also building coopetition networks in general (Dambiski Gomes de Carvalho et al , 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, their tolerance of the negative effects of tourism changes according to the situation of being native or one's length of the duration of living in the region. Considering the tourism destination has a complex structure and consists of various actors based on both mutual relationships and different interests (Woyo and Slabbert, 2019), policymakers should be aware of these differences and take them into consideration while developing plans, policies, strategies and also building coopetition networks in general (Dambiski Gomes de Carvalho et al , 2020).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the innovation process, new or enhanced product ideas, services, processes, marketing tactics and organizational practices are implemented and commercialized (de Carvalho et al , 2020). Experts have emphasized innovation as a crucial tool for strengthening company growth potential at various levels (Backman et al , 2017; Teixeira et al , 2019).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding innovation, the Oslo Manual (OECD & Eurostat, 2005 stands as a seminal reference that bases different innovation and innovativeness measures applied in the literature, besides regional and national innovation surveys (Alves & Galina, 2020;Melo et al, 2017). The innovativeness concept is related to companies' innovation capability and comprises innovation inputs, activities/ capabilities, and outputs, wherein innovation outputs are innovations per se (Carvalho, Cruz et al, 2020;Quandt & Castilho, 2017). In this sense, the business innovation concept was recently updated in the fourth edition of the Oslo Manual as "[.…”
Section: Framework-quality-excellence Management and Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%