2018
DOI: 10.1108/inmr-04-2018-010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Innovation in judicial services: a study of innovation models in labor courts

Abstract: Purpose-The purpose of this study is to identify innovation models in the judiciary according to the current integrated theoretical approach for innovation in services. Design/methodology/approach-This study uses a quantitative approach. The authors collected the data through a questionnaire sent to labor court public servants and judges in a Regional Labor Court in the Midwestern region of Brazil. They performed a principal component analysis to identify the factors to map the innovation models present in the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Pioneer in studies that linked innovation to economic development, Schumpeter (1984) saw innovation as the mechanism of growth and economic development in a process he called "creative destruction" (Sucupira et al, 2019). The following studies corroborate with the innovation premise: Wan et al (2020), Castro and Guimarães (2020), Machado et al (2018), Sousa and Guimarães (2017), Oh et al (2014) and Freitas and Medeiros (2015).…”
Section: Theoretical Referencesupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Pioneer in studies that linked innovation to economic development, Schumpeter (1984) saw innovation as the mechanism of growth and economic development in a process he called "creative destruction" (Sucupira et al, 2019). The following studies corroborate with the innovation premise: Wan et al (2020), Castro and Guimarães (2020), Machado et al (2018), Sousa and Guimarães (2017), Oh et al (2014) and Freitas and Medeiros (2015).…”
Section: Theoretical Referencesupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Judiciary services are responsible for interpreting and enforcing laws, resolving disputes, and ensuring justice is served [301,302]. The branch includes judges, lawyers, and court personnel who work together to maintain the balance of power between branches of government and uphold the rule of law.…”
Section: Judiciary Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although scientific production about the nature of innovation in the public sector is growing, Santos, Sano and Souza (2019), Souza, Ferreira, Najberg and Medeiros (2015), Potts and Kastelle (2010) and Walker (2007) state that this field is still limited, and it is necessary to increase the knowledge of the researchers in the area. One way to promote the production and the advertisement of good practices about innovation in the public administration is through the analysis of innovation contests and/or awards (Brito, Castro, Bezerra, Silva & Silva, 2020;Machado, Sousa, Rocha & Isidro, 2018;Adamczyk, Bullinger & Möslein, 2012), which have been efficient to create problem solutions, besides avoiding the accidental and episodic character of innovation in the public administration (Sørensen & Torfing, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%