Innovation in family firms: an empirical taxonomy of owners using a mixed methods approach

Abstract

Purpose The increasingly competitive manufacturing sector has made innovation crucial for the continued survival of family-owned SMEs. However, family firm owners are highly heterogenous and their diverse characteristics influence their approach to innovation. The purpose of this paper is to provide solutions to two heterogeneity related innovation problems: first, the failure of generic innovation policy advice to address the specific types of family firm owners; and second, the difficulty for owners in understanding how their innovation approach compares to their competitors. The solution is to create a taxonomy of family firm owner-innovators which creates innovator types. This taxonomy addresses these two problems: first, the taxonomy enables policy advice to be tailored to a particular innovator types; and second, the taxonomy allows owners to understand the strengths and weaknesses of their particular approach to innovation. Design/methodology/approach The approach is to develop a taxonomy through exploratory factor analysis (n=1,284) and firm owner interviews (n=27) in a mixed methods study. Socio-emotional wealth theory interprets the findings. Findings The findings present a taxonomy of family firm innovators which contains five types: the spontaneous radical, the statist altruist, the patient opportunist, the curious traveller and the insular denier. Research limitations/implications There are two major limitations: first, a taxonomy is static and does not include the temporal dimension of innovation which can change according to the firm lifecycle stage and, by implication, the changing preferences of a maturing firm owner; and second, the mixed methods approach of using two data sets which themselves used differing definitions of “family firm” has introduced the possibility that the constructs developed from the quantitative study may not have the precision or clarity of a study that uses a single data set with a single definition. Practical implications The practitioner implications from the research stem from the diagnostic potential of the taxonomy. SME family firm owners can establish their innovation approach by using the taxonomy to decide which type of innovator they are and by adopting an innovation approach that counterbalances the weaknesses of their type. Social implications The social implications are to improve the innovation potential of the family firm community by offering practical support to their innovation activities. Originality/value The originality of the research is in its contribution to knowledge on the role of ownership type in directing the innovation approach of SME family firms. The value of the research is in offering a theoretically informed original taxonomy that is of both academic and practical value.

Management accounting research in family businesses: a review of the status quo and future agenda

“…Notwithstanding this, coming together of "management accounting" and "family firms" has only sporadically occurred in the minds of past researchers, and management accounting as well as family business literatures have seen developments on their own fronts. Although management accounting scholars have given priority to public and private commercial entities as their empirical contexts, management accounting has somewhat escaped mainstream family business research, which has concentrated on facets such as performance (Williams et al, 2019;Aloulou, 2018;Razzak and Jassem, 2019), decision-making (Pimentel et al, 2018) and innovation (Hillebrand, 2019;Salmon and Allman, 2019;Röd, 2019). An emerging interest is nevertheless witnessed on the nexus between accounting and family businesses, as demonstrated by an increasing number of recent family business studies with an accounting twist (Hiebl et al, 2013;Hiebl, 2013a;Mitter and Hiebl, 2017).…”

Executives’ Knowledge Management and Emotional Intelligence Role: Dynamizing Factor towards Open Innovation

“…Regardless there is a lack of empirical studies that integrate and synthesize taxonomies of executives related to innovation, such as Salmon and Allman [18]. This research contributes to identify a taxonomy of executives' profiles to avoid the loss of innovative potential in companies from different areas of activity: health, industrial, social, finance, educational, and others, related to innovation, knowledge management and emotional intelligence.…”

“…Regardless of the growing number of studies on management innovation where we can find different taxonomies linked to innovation [15][16][17]. There is a lack of empirical studies that integrate and synthesize taxonomies of owners or executives [18] related to innovation, emotional intelligence and knowledge management.…”

Positive psychological capital, market orientation, and business performance of family business in the culinary sector: A research study

“…This research is based on the importance of family business in accordance with its relationship to the economy, such as its contribution to the formation of gross national products as well as its benefits. The contribution of Micro, Small, and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) involved in culinary businesses is a challenging task particularly in this era of digital economy which relies on innovation and creativity (Salmon & Allman, 2019;Frank et al, 2019;Jiménez et al, 2020).…”