Injured Athletes' Rehabilitation Beliefs and Subjective Well-Being: The Contribution of Hope and Social Support

Lu, Frank Jing-Horng; Hsu, Ya-Wen

doi:10.4085/1062-6050-48.1.03

Cited by 70 publications

(55 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Also this investigation is the first to explore the relationships between hope and subjective happiness. Although many studies have suggested that subjective happiness can substantially influence hope (Lu & Hsu, 2013), no research has addressed the factors that might mediate these relationships. In other words, subjective happiness and literature is unclear about how subjective happiness increases hope or vice versa.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Felicidad y esperanza subjetiva

Sarıçam

2015

Univ Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

a b S t r a c tThe aim of this research is to examine the relationships between subjective happiness and hope. The participants were 435 university students. In this study, the Integrative Hope Scale and the Subjective Happiness Scale were used. The relationships between were examined using correlation analysis and Structural Equation Model (SEM). In correlation analysis, trust and confidence, positive future orientation, and social relations and personal value sub factors of hope were found positively related to subjective happiness. On the other hand, lack of perspective sub factor of hope was found negatively correlated to subjective happiness. Structural Equation Model showed that subjective happiness was predicted positively by trust and confidence, positive future orientation, and social relations and personal value. However, subjective happiness was negatively explained by lack of perspective. According to standardized beta coefficients (β= 0.34), the most significant predictor of subjective happiness was trust and confidence. Results were discussed in the light of the related literature. Keywords happiness; hope; future; trust; confidence r e S u m e n El objetivo de esta investigación es examinar las relaciones entre la felicidad subjetiva y la esperanza. Los participantes fueron 435 estudiantes universitarios. En este estudio, se utilizaron la Escala de Esperanza Integrativa y la Escala de Felicidad Subjetiva. Las relaciones fueron examinadas usando análisis de correlación y modelo de ecuaciones estructurales (SEM). En el análisis de correlación, la verdad y la confianza, la orientación positiva al futuro, y las relaciones sociales y los subfactores de valores personales de esperanza presentaron una relación positiva con la felicidad subjetiva. Por otro lado, la falta del subfactor de perspectiva de esperanza se encontró una correlación negativa con la felicidad subjetiva. El Modelo de Ecuaciones Estructurales mostró que la felicidad subjetiva se predijo positivamente por la verdad y la confianza, orientación positiva al futuro, y las relaciones sociales y el valor personal. Sin embargo, la felicidad subjetiva se explicó negativamente por la falta de perspectiva. De acuerdo con los coeficientes beta estandarizados (β = 0.34), el predictor más importante de la felicidad subjetiva fue la verdad y la confianza. Los resultados se discuten a la luz de la literatura relacionada.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Felicidad y esperanza subjetiva

Sarıçam

2015

Univ Psychol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…R = 0.58, p < 0.01. Population: US (students) 53 Lu and Hsu (2013). PANAS positive affect versus ATHS pathways subscale.…”

Section: Appendix: Studies Included In Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Relations between Hope and Subjective Well-Being: a Literature Overview and Empirical Analysis

Pleeging

Burger

Exel

2019

Applied Research Quality Life

107

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

How we perceive the future can greatly affect how we feel in the present. Even a currently positive situation is hard to bear when we know the future will be grim. Indeed, previous research has found that more hopeful people are happier. However, both hope and subjective well-being are multidimensional concepts comprising emotion (i.e., anticipation and affect), cognition (expectation and satisfaction) and, to some degree, motivation. Since most studies include only one dimension of hope and subjective well-being, little is known about how different aspects of hope relate to different aspects of subjective well-being. This study aims to gain insight into these relationships by providing an overview of the existing empirical literature on hope and subjective well-being. Subsequently, cross-sectional data of a representative sample of the American population are used to further examine the relationship between hope and subjective well-being. Our findings from both the literature and our empirical analysis show that positive expectations are only weakly associated with all domains of subjective well-being, whereas cognitive and emotional hope are most strongly related to subjective well-being. This finding indicates that the more passive characteristics of positive expectations have less of an impact on subjective well-being than a more agentic hopeful disposition.

show abstract

“…In recent years, researchers have turned their attention toward understanding positive environments, traits, and subjective experiences in the context of sport injury (e.g., Smith & Sparkes, 2005;Niven, 2007;Tracey, 2011;Lu & Hsu, 2013;Day & Wadey, 2016). This shift in the literature from the dominant focus on the negative consequences of injury has helped provide a greater understanding of athletes' recovery from injury.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Stress‐related growth following sport injury: Examining the applicability of the organismic valuing theory

Wadey¹,

Podlog

Galli

et al. 2015

Scandinavian Med Sci Sports

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study explored the applicability of organismic valuing theory (OVT) to stress-related growth (SRG) following sport injury. Specifically, the direct and indirect relationships between need satisfaction (i.e., autonomy, competence, and relatedness), SRG, and subjective well-being (i.e., positive affect) were examined. Previously injured athletes (n = 520), ranging from 18 to 59 years of age (Mage = 23.3 years; standard deviation = 6.5), completed three measures: needs satisfaction scale, stress-related growth scale, and positive affect scale. Structural equation modeling with maximum likelihood estimation revealed a significant positive relationship between competence and relatedness and SRG, and between SRG and positive affect. In line with OVT, SRG was also found to mediate the relationship between need satisfaction (competence and relatedness) and subjective well-being. The findings offer preliminary support for the applicability of OVT in aiding our understanding of the antecedents and consequences of SRG. Future avenues of research are discussed, together with recommended methodologies to further extend and refine knowledge and understanding of the phenomenon of SRG following sport injury.

show abstract

Injured Athletes' Rehabilitation Beliefs and Subjective Well-Being: The Contribution of Hope and Social Support

Cited by 70 publications

References 29 publications

Felicidad y esperanza subjetiva

Felicidad y esperanza subjetiva

The Relations between Hope and Subjective Well-Being: a Literature Overview and Empirical Analysis

Stress‐related growth following sport injury: Examining the applicability of the organismic valuing theory

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About