Initial stages of information processing and inspection time: Electrophysiological correlates

Intelligence and inspection time: Achievements, prospects, and problems.

“…The most advanced of such approaches has been the effort to integrate scores from psychometric intelligence tests with both inspection time and evoked potential indexes. Analyses of participants' brain-evoked potentials while they performed the inspection-time task found that differences at about 140–200 ms after stimulus onset distinguish those who are superior on both inspection time and IQ tasks (Caryl, 1994; Colet, Piera, & Pueyo, 1993; Morris & Alcorn, 1995; Zhang, Caryl, & Deary, 1989a, 1989b). Participants who obtain higher scores on IQ-type tasks and those with faster inspection times tend to have a steeper evoked-potential slope as the negative deflection at about 100 ms after stimulus onset becomes a positive deflection at about 200 ms after stimulus onset.…”

Event-related potentials in clinical research: Guidelines for eliciting, recording, and quantifying mismatch negativity, P300, and N400

“…Some of the determinants affecting P300 amplitude and latency include circadian and other seasonal cycles (Deldin et al, 1994), exercise and fatigue (Yagi et al, 1999), commonly used drugs, age, IQ, handedness, and gender, as well as some personality variables (Polich and Kok, 1995). Moreover, differences related to attentional capacity need to be considered (Kujala and Näätänen, 2003;Näätänen, 1995;Orlebeke et al, 1989;Pelosi et al, 1992a,b;Colet et al, 1993;Stelmack and Houlihan, 1994).…”

Reductionism and intelligence: the case of inspection time

“…Citing a desire to confirm the particular aspects of stimulus evaluation time that IT assesses as their major motivation, Colet, Piera & Pueyo (1993) conducted further research on IT and AEPs. They tested 200 subjects on an auditory oddball task and separately took IT measurements.…”