2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.06.550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Initial Results from Fluor's CO2 Capture Demonstration Plant Using Econamine FG PlusSM Technology at E.ON Kraftwerke's Wilhelmshaven Power Plant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence, most of the reported designs may be suboptimal, and some of them appear to be unrealistic from practical and operational viewpoints when compared with the design data in the nonconfidential report of the front end engineering design (FEED) study undertaken by Fluor for the "ROAD project" (Rotterdam Opslag en Afvang Demonstratieproject; Rotterdam Capture and Storage Demonstration Project), 32 as well as statements in process licensor reports. 33 −35 1.1. Motivation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a consequence, most of the reported designs may be suboptimal, and some of them appear to be unrealistic from practical and operational viewpoints when compared with the design data in the nonconfidential report of the front end engineering design (FEED) study undertaken by Fluor for the "ROAD project" (Rotterdam Opslag en Afvang Demonstratieproject; Rotterdam Capture and Storage Demonstration Project), 32 as well as statements in process licensor reports. 33 −35 1.1. Motivation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from the paper by Kvamsdal et al, most of the commercial-scale CO 2 capture plant designs that have been reported in the open literature are based on values of CO 2 loadings and/or solvent circulation rates without an openly available techno-economic consideration. As a consequence, most of the reported designs may be suboptimal, and some of them appear to be unrealistic from practical and operational viewpoints when compared with the design data in the nonconfidential report of the front end engineering design (FEED) study undertaken by Fluor for the “ROAD project” ( Rotterdam Opslag en Afvang Demonstratieproject ; Rotterdam Capture and Storage Demonstration Project), as well as statements in process licensor reports. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This CO2 capture process is proven, cost-effective and applicable to low-pressure, O2containing flue gas. It was licensed to 28 plants worldwide [60]. The CO2 recovery pilot plant, commissioned in 2012 at the E.ON's coal-fired power plant in Wilhelmshaven, proprietary inhibitor to the MEA solution.…”
Section: The Fluor Efg+ Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CO2 recovery pilot plant, commissioned in 2012 at the E.ON's coal-fired power plant in Wilhelmshaven, proprietary inhibitor to the MEA solution. SO2 should be removed to below 10 ppm to limit the cost of proprietary inhibitors and excessive solvent makeup [39,59,60].…”
Section: The Fluor Efg+ Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technology of choice is the Fluor EconamineFG Plus SM process and the captured CO 2 will be used in EOR processes at the West Ranch Oil field, where it is expected to increase oil production from 500 to 15000 barrels per day [40]. The Fluor EconamineFG Plus SM system is based on 30 wt-% MEA with inhibitors and has been tested in pilot scale facilities in Germany [41].…”
Section: Coal Combustion (Pcc) Plants the Boundary Dammentioning
confidence: 99%