2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-014-3065-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibition equivalency factors for microcystin variants in recombinant and wild-type protein phosphatase 1 and 2A assays

Abstract: In this work, protein phosphatase inhibition assays (PPIAs) have been used to evaluate the performance of recombinant PP1 and recombinant and wild-type PP2As. The enzymes have been compared using microcystins-LR (MC-LR) as a model cyanotoxin. Whereas PP2ARec provides a limit of detection (LOD) of 3.1 μg/L, PP1Rec and PP2AWild provide LODs of 0.6 and 0.5 μg/L, respectively, lower than the guideline value proposed by the World Health Organization (1 μg/L). The inhibitory potencies of seven MC variants (-LR, -RR,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…With more than 240 congeners, MC-LR is considered to be one of the most common, abundant and toxic structural variants, with a median lethal dose (LD50, acute oral toxicity) of 5-mg/kg bodyweight (bw) of orally exposed mice and a no-observed adverse effect level (NOAEL liver ) of 40 µg/kg/day for 13 weeks of repeated dose exposure (chronic toxicity) [2,47,[78][79][80][81][82]. Modifications of MC molecules, including modifications of Adda-methyldehydroalanine region as well as other parts, such as variable amino acid residues at positions 2 and 4, can lead to the reduction of PP1/2A inhibition potencies [62,63,[83][84][85][86][87]. However, the observed differences in acute in vivo toxicity of MCs [87] cannot be exclusively attributed to the differences in PP1/2A inhibition among different MC variants.…”
Section: Microcystin Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With more than 240 congeners, MC-LR is considered to be one of the most common, abundant and toxic structural variants, with a median lethal dose (LD50, acute oral toxicity) of 5-mg/kg bodyweight (bw) of orally exposed mice and a no-observed adverse effect level (NOAEL liver ) of 40 µg/kg/day for 13 weeks of repeated dose exposure (chronic toxicity) [2,47,[78][79][80][81][82]. Modifications of MC molecules, including modifications of Adda-methyldehydroalanine region as well as other parts, such as variable amino acid residues at positions 2 and 4, can lead to the reduction of PP1/2A inhibition potencies [62,63,[83][84][85][86][87]. However, the observed differences in acute in vivo toxicity of MCs [87] cannot be exclusively attributed to the differences in PP1/2A inhibition among different MC variants.…”
Section: Microcystin Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We tested two MCs, MC-LR and MC-LF, as there is little known about the inhibition potency of MC variants with different physicochemical properties. MC-LR and MC-LF were chosen based on their estimated [ 34 ] and experimental [ 20 ] octanol-water partition coefficient, lethal concentration [ 20 ], and recombinant PP1 IC 50 [ 35 ]. In our study MC-LR and MC-LF inhibited PP1 with similar potency suggesting that the difference in hydrophobicity did not influence the toxicodynamics in the PPIA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in agreement with several published studies demonstrating that MC-LR and MC-LF have similar IC 50 values for PP1 (1.2 and 1.8 µg/L [ 36 ], 1 and 3µg/L [ 37 ], 1.4 and 2.2 µg/L [ 38 ], for MC-LR and MC-LF, respectively). Recently a study using PP1 and p NPP to establish inhibition equivalency factors for different MC congeners in relation to MC-LR determined an IC 50 of 2.1 µg/L for MC-LR and an IC 50 of 359.3 µg/L for MC-LF [ 35 ]. The overall trend of lowest to highest IC 50 was as follows: MC-LR > MC-RR > MC-YR > MC-LY > MC-LW > MC-LF.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, immunobiotest ELIS, can be used as a screening method for estimation of microcystins concentrations (Metcalf and Codd, 2004;Lawton et al, 2010). Moreover, for the determination of biological activity (toxicity) of microcystins, the screening Protein Phosphatase Inhibition Assay was proposed (An and Carmichael, 1994;Sevilla et al, 2009;Garibo et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%