2017
DOI: 10.1080/14616734.2017.1342172
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inhibited attachment disordered behavior in institutionalized preschool children: links with early and current relational experiences

Abstract: Inhibited attachment disordered behavior (IADB) is characterized by difficulty in establishing an attachment relationship with a primary caregiver; is associated with persistent social and emotional problems; and is observed most frequently in contexts of pathological care such as institutional rearing. Here, we seek to enhance understanding of the conditions that give rise to IADB among institutionalized children by examining prior family experiences of neglect and deprivation and concurrent relational experi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
(47 reference statements)
0
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…17 Therefore, it is necessary to have greater constancy in the care of institutionalized children, with individualized attention and receptive and stable contact, since, in the presence of these, the risk of the development of inhibited attachment and disorganized behavior in children is reduced. 18 Thus, the guarantee of a care that considers the individuality and subjectivity of the child enables a better quality. 19 Neglect of care of food, hygiene, caring and physical and emotional violence suffered by children in their families brings suffering to caregivers, making work performance difficult, especially in the first experiences and in those in which signs of maltreatment are more evident.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Therefore, it is necessary to have greater constancy in the care of institutionalized children, with individualized attention and receptive and stable contact, since, in the presence of these, the risk of the development of inhibited attachment and disorganized behavior in children is reduced. 18 Thus, the guarantee of a care that considers the individuality and subjectivity of the child enables a better quality. 19 Neglect of care of food, hygiene, caring and physical and emotional violence suffered by children in their families brings suffering to caregivers, making work performance difficult, especially in the first experiences and in those in which signs of maltreatment are more evident.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os vínculos familiares são fundamentais para essas crianças em desenvolvimento, uma vez que serão fundamentais para a formação de identidade e sua constituição enquanto sujeito (Platilha, Magalhães & Pedroso, 2014). Um estudo realizado em Portugal aponta que quando há a presença de contatos frequentes da criança com seus familiares, na residência familiar em detrimento da visita na própria instituição, esses sujeitos apresentam menores índices de comportamentos de apego inibido (Corval, Belsky, Baptista, Oliveira, Mesquita & Soares, 2017).…”
Section: Relações Familiaresunclassified
“…Crianças acolhidas que recebem cuidados de educadores com menor disponibilidade afetiva apresentam maior probabilidade de apresentar desenvolvimento socioemocional fragilizado (Baptista, Silva, Marques, Martins & Soares, 2018;Corval, Belsky, Baptista, Oliveira, Mesquita & Soares, 2017). Sendo que as crianças ressaltam o quão negativo é para elas a interação com educadores mais rígidos, sendo importante compreender que a forma como esse cuidador interage com a criança pode refletir na maneira como ela interage com seus pares (Furtado, Magalhães, Silva, Cruz & Santos, 2019;Platilha, Magalhães & Pedroso, 2014).…”
Section: Relações Institucionaisunclassified
“…Both individual and contextual factors were associated with RAD. Contextual factors included institutionalization (Humphreys et al, 2017; C. H. Zeanah, A. T. Smyke, S. F. Koga, & E. Carlson, 2005); quality of caregiving in the institution (Corval et al, 2017;Gleason et al, 2011;McGoron et al, 2012;C. H. Zeanah et al, 2005;P.…”
Section: Review Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%