2017
DOI: 10.1631/fitee.1601235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information schema constructs for instantiation and composition of system manifestation features

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to traditional products, the design of CPSS devices requires engineers to have a better understanding of the system level behaviors, as well as the new methodology for the optimization at the network scale. Systems level modeling methods and tools have been developed for CPSS design and analysis, such as hybrid discrete-event and continuous simulations (Jeon et al, 2012;Lee et al, 2015aLee et al, , 2015b, inductive constraint logic programming (Saeedloei and Gupta, 2011) abductive reasoning (Horváth, 2019), hybrid timed automaton (Burmester et al, 2012), ontologies (Petnga and Austin, 2016), information schema (Pourtalebi and Horváth, 2017), UML (Magureanu et al, 2010), and SysML (Palachi et al, 2013).…”
Section: Cpss System-of-systems Level Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to traditional products, the design of CPSS devices requires engineers to have a better understanding of the system level behaviors, as well as the new methodology for the optimization at the network scale. Systems level modeling methods and tools have been developed for CPSS design and analysis, such as hybrid discrete-event and continuous simulations (Jeon et al, 2012;Lee et al, 2015aLee et al, , 2015b, inductive constraint logic programming (Saeedloei and Gupta, 2011) abductive reasoning (Horváth, 2019), hybrid timed automaton (Burmester et al, 2012), ontologies (Petnga and Austin, 2016), information schema (Pourtalebi and Horváth, 2017), UML (Magureanu et al, 2010), and SysML (Palachi et al, 2013).…”
Section: Cpss System-of-systems Level Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed SMF-TB imposes a strictly physical view, i.e., it models system constituents in the 3D Euclidian space and captures their relationships as mereotopological relations (rather than just representing them by abstract modeling surrogates). The ISCs for: (i) representation of operation and architecture relations, (ii) assigning values to parameter variables, (iii) managing the meta-level knowledge-base of the model warehouse, (iv) recording the composition and parametrization history, and (v) recording the state, event and stream unification history of the instantiation and composition of system constituents are discussed in [78]. The overall process of The proposed SMF-TB imposes a strictly physical view, i.e., it models system constituents in the 3D Euclidian space and captures their relationships as mereotopological relations (rather than just representing them by abstract modeling surrogates).…”
Section: System-level Feature-based Conceptualization and Modeling Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%