2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00228-005-0943-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Information deficits in the summary of product characteristics preclude an optimal management of drug interactions: a comparison with evidence from the literature

Abstract: If physicians only rely on SPC information for drug interactions, adverse events due to lacking management recommendations may occur. To meet the SPCs claim of being the basis of information for health professionals on how to use medicinal products safely and effectively, information on drug interactions should be thoroughly up-dated and expanded.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
39
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
39
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite being considered a leading source of information for safety data and evidence-based prescribing decisions [15], SmPCs have been criticized for containing important clinical pharmacology information deficits [16], for being suboptimal sources of information for drug−drug interactions [17], food−drug interactions [18], therapeutic drug monitoring [19], or dose adjustment in renal impairment [20]. In addition, SmPCs have also been criticized for being too verbose, lacking standardization and being heterogeneous [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite being considered a leading source of information for safety data and evidence-based prescribing decisions [15], SmPCs have been criticized for containing important clinical pharmacology information deficits [16], for being suboptimal sources of information for drug−drug interactions [17], food−drug interactions [18], therapeutic drug monitoring [19], or dose adjustment in renal impairment [20]. In addition, SmPCs have also been criticized for being too verbose, lacking standardization and being heterogeneous [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Important information can be the most common adverse effects, significant contraindications, significant drug interactions, and advice during special conditions, contraindications during pregnancy and lactation, driving and machine safety. 15 These important information must be printed in such a way that patient and often practitioners must be able to note it, the moment they go through the literature. In our study, we evaluated the ease of finding such important information in drug inserts and we found that our drug companies have to work a long way in making such patient friendly inserts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example information about drug-drug interactions can be found in the SPC for drug A from provider 1 but is missing in the SPC for the same product from provider 2. Alternatively, the drug-drug interaction between drug A and B can be found in the SPC text for drug A but not for drug B (Bergk et al, 2005). Another example for inconsistencies is the classification for drug and pregnancy alerts for pharmaceutical products.…”
Section: Development Of Knowledge Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%