2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsp.2019.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Informant discrepancies in assessments of psychosocial functioning in school-based services and research: Review and directions for future research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
1
58
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As the results from the current study and previous research [46, 47] indicate outcomes do not always coincide when using different informants on internalizing symptoms. This doesn’t mean that either one is wrong; different informants offer different perspectives and observations across different contexts.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As the results from the current study and previous research [46, 47] indicate outcomes do not always coincide when using different informants on internalizing symptoms. This doesn’t mean that either one is wrong; different informants offer different perspectives and observations across different contexts.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 52%
“…Thus, it is necessary to recognize the individual informants’ unique perspectives on internalizing symptoms. Because of this, it has been advocated that ratings from different informants are preferred [46, 47]. According to a recent review of assessments of psychosocial functioning in school-based services and research, informant discrepancies seem to be consistent across samples and studies over time [47].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Further, due to the social positioning of a person "no one person […] has the capacity to observe and accurately rate their functioning across all contexts" (De Los Reyes, Cook, Gresham, Makol, & Wang, 2019, p. 75). These biases could be addressed by means of multi-informant ratings (De Los Reyes et al, 2019).…”
Section: Sei Competence Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%