2014
DOI: 10.18406/2316-1817v6n32014589
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influência de bioativadores e bioestimulantes na produção de mudas de cafeeiros

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the biometric data demonstrated a good plant development at 120 DAP. The growth parameters used were similar to those reported by Marana et al (2008) andDer Vliet et al (2009) for 150-day-old coffee seedlings and by Melo & Maciel (2014) at 189 DAP. The beneficial effect of the higher electrical conductivity of the nutrient solution on growth is likely due to the greater supply of nutrients to the plants, since electrical conductivity was raised by increasing the fertilizer concentration in the nutrient solution.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, the biometric data demonstrated a good plant development at 120 DAP. The growth parameters used were similar to those reported by Marana et al (2008) andDer Vliet et al (2009) for 150-day-old coffee seedlings and by Melo & Maciel (2014) at 189 DAP. The beneficial effect of the higher electrical conductivity of the nutrient solution on growth is likely due to the greater supply of nutrients to the plants, since electrical conductivity was raised by increasing the fertilizer concentration in the nutrient solution.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Another advantage of growing coffee seedlings in smaller containers (50 cm 3 or 120 cm 3 ) is a greater plant adherence to the substrate, which does not break up during planting (Favarin et al 2008). However, when comparing the root data obtained here in 50 cm 3 tubes (root length = 12.7 cm; root dry mass = 0.23 g) with those reported by Marana et al (2008) in 120 cm 3 tubes (root dry mass = 0.24 g) and data from studies that used larger containers, such as 180 mL tubes (Der Vliet et al 2009; root dry mass = 0.72 g) and 18 cm x 4 cm bags (Melo & Maciel 2014; root length = 18.9 cm; root dry mass = 0.74 g), it can be inferred that smaller containers may restrict root growth.…”
Section: Source Of Variationsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations