2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-06832013000300007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influência das frações de areia na retenção e disponibilidade de água em solos das formações Caiuá e Paranavaí

Abstract: RESUMOTem sido verificado que a adoção das técnicas de uso e manejo para solos derivados do arenito Caiuá no noroeste do Paraná nem sempre corresponde às expectativas de produção das culturas. Nessa região ocorrem duas Formações desse arenito: a Caiuá e a Paranavaí, com diferenças na granulometria dos solos. A hipótese é de que os solos da Formação Caiuá tenham menor retenção e disponibilidade de água para a produção agrícola, em razão da maior proporção da fração de areia grossa do que solos da Formação Paran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0
8

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
21
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…This great retention is explained by the high fine sand content in its A horizon (124 g kg -1 ) ( Table 1). Similar results were found by Fidalski et al (2013), who evaluated sandy soils and found higher soil water retention in horizons that had predominance of the fine sand fraction. The higher microporosity (53.03%), and total porosity (56.79%) of the A horizon (Table 3) may also explain these results, since the particle structural arrangement and pore distribution affect the available water, especially smaller diameter pores (Kiehl, 1979).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…This great retention is explained by the high fine sand content in its A horizon (124 g kg -1 ) ( Table 1). Similar results were found by Fidalski et al (2013), who evaluated sandy soils and found higher soil water retention in horizons that had predominance of the fine sand fraction. The higher microporosity (53.03%), and total porosity (56.79%) of the A horizon (Table 3) may also explain these results, since the particle structural arrangement and pore distribution affect the available water, especially smaller diameter pores (Kiehl, 1979).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Being sandy, this soil contributes to a more uniform structural organization, so that the difference among the curves may be linked to other factors and not only to the size of the undisturbed sample. In studying the influence of the sand fraction on water retention and water availability in soils originated from sandstone, Fidalski et al (2013) found that fine sand was responsible for the formation of smaller pores and greater retention of water when compared to another soil of more sandy texture. The soil pore distribution depends on the combination of soil texture and soil structure: the pores due to the texture (ultra and cryptomicropores) strongly retain the water in the soil by adsorption, and the secondary pores, that is, the structural ones, correspond to the spaces within the soil aggregates (Zaffar and Lu, 2015).…”
Section: Rev Bras Cienc Solo 2018;42:e0180058mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This region occupies a total area of 3.2 million hectares, representing approximately 16% of the total area of the state (SÁ; CAVIGLIONE, 1999). Medium and sandy-textured soils originated from Caiuá sandstone, with high susceptibility to erosion and low water storage capacity, are predominant in this region (FIDALSKI et al, 2013). The sand contents reach 850-900 g kg -1 , and the contents of phosphorus, potassium, calcium, magnesium and organic matter are generally critical for crop growth (COSTA et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%