2018
DOI: 10.5007/2175-8069.2018v15n34p181
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influência da estrutura do conselho de administração e do controle corporativo no turnover do CEO das empresas abertas no Brasil

Abstract: A segregação entre a propriedade e o controle existente nas corporações tem ressaltado o papel do Conselho de Administração, responsável por eleger, destituir, monitorar e avaliar as ações da equipe de gestão, cujo principal agente é o Chief Executive Officer (CEO). Nesse contexto, este trabalho analisou a influência da estrutura do Conselho de Administração e do Controle Corporativo no turnover do CEO das empresas abertas no Brasil. A amostra reuniu 111 empresas integrantes do índice IBrX100 da Bolsa, Brasil,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(40 reference statements)
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The relationship with monitoring executives is one of the conditions for the effectiveness of Board as a CG mechanism (Brandão et al, 2019). More independent Boards make board participation more effective (Weisbach, 1988), while dual roles between CEO and Chairman increase the likelihood of higher remuneration not linked to performance (Vieira & Silva, 2018), as it can interfere with monitoring and was prohibited by the modification brought by Law No. 14,195, of 2021 to § 3 of article 138 of Federal Law 6,404/76.…”
Section: Board Ownership Concentration and Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship with monitoring executives is one of the conditions for the effectiveness of Board as a CG mechanism (Brandão et al, 2019). More independent Boards make board participation more effective (Weisbach, 1988), while dual roles between CEO and Chairman increase the likelihood of higher remuneration not linked to performance (Vieira & Silva, 2018), as it can interfere with monitoring and was prohibited by the modification brought by Law No. 14,195, of 2021 to § 3 of article 138 of Federal Law 6,404/76.…”
Section: Board Ownership Concentration and Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Este resutado é superior ao encontrado por estudos similares em outros países podendo indicar que a alta conectividade entre CEO e CA é uma característica própria do mercado brasileiro (Balsam et al, 2017;Hwang & Kim, 2009). Os resultados confirmam que na presença de conexões sociais, há menor probabilidade de rotatividade involuntária do CEO e que esta não relaciona-se com a concentração acionária ou com características estruturais do CA contrariando estudos anteriores (Vieira & Martins, 2018;Guo & Masulis, 2015).…”
Section: Considerações Finaisunclassified
“…Differently from markets with capital dispersion, where the focus is on the problems between principal vs agent, in markets in which capital concentration occurs, as is the case in Brazil, the problems arising from the principal vs principal relationship, that is, between majority and minority shareholders, are more relevant (Carvalho and Ribeiro, 2019;Dalm acio and Corrar, 2007). In this context, the expropriation of minority shareholders by majority shareholders is more significant since the controlling shareholders do not want to risk losing the protection of invested capital or the control of the organization (C espedes et al, 2010;La Porta et al, 1999;Vieira and Martins, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%