2011
DOI: 10.1080/01490400.2011.606780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influences of Personal, Social, and Environmental Factors on Workday Use Frequency of the Nearby Outdoor Recreation Areas by Working People

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, respondents have a negative preference (WTT) for increasing travel distance. This is in line with studies by Tyrväinen (1999Tyrväinen ( , 2001), Jensen and Koch (2004), and Degenhardt et al (2011), which report the positive effect of proximity of forest on the frequency of visit. Thus, increase in travel distance will decrease preference of forest visitation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In general, respondents have a negative preference (WTT) for increasing travel distance. This is in line with studies by Tyrväinen (1999Tyrväinen ( , 2001), Jensen and Koch (2004), and Degenhardt et al (2011), which report the positive effect of proximity of forest on the frequency of visit. Thus, increase in travel distance will decrease preference of forest visitation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…the pedestrians who tend to use recreation areas close to the settlement that did not entirely match with their stated landscape preferences. This identified mismatch corresponds with literature on psychological restoration that emphasizes the time and energy constraints affecting people's outdoor recreation (Degenhardt et al, 2011;Korpela & Kinnunen, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…This is not to say that we neglect "place"-related theories, but that they play a far less important role in this paper. Our study shows that landscape parameters can explain residents presence around mid-sized towns to a surprisingly high degree -far higher than psychological models of recreation behavior (Degenhardt et al 2010;Degenhardt, Frick, Buchecker, & Guscher, 2011). We also show that there exists (1) a culture-independent, common understanding of preferred landscape properties for recreation (2) group-specific preferences, and (3) site-specific preferences, i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Degenhardt et al (2011) referiram que a exposição à natureza contribui para o bem-estar geral e para a saúde dos indivíduos, e que as investigações indicaram uma série de benefícios físicos, emocionais, cognitivos, sociais, educacionais e espirituais associados à recreação na natureza. Face a esses resultados, sugeriram que um acesso rápido dentro das cidades a diversas áreas de lazer e a disponibilização de informação espacial (como a localização dos espaços) de fácil utilização podem ser formas de potenciar uma prática recreativa frequente por parte da população trabalhista.…”
Section: Desporto De Natureza E O Pilar Socialunclassified