2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2014.08.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Willingness to travel to avoid recreation conflicts in Danish forests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
2
12
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The predominance of short trips was also noticed by Dinu et al [37] at the national level. Negative preference for long travel distance was also found by Dumitras [23] and Bakhtiari et al [38].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The predominance of short trips was also noticed by Dinu et al [37] at the national level. Negative preference for long travel distance was also found by Dumitras [23] and Bakhtiari et al [38].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…As a consequence, forests closer to urban areas are found to be intensively used for recreation (DFNA 2002, Arnberger 2006). On the other hand, some forest visitors may also be trading off distance and go farther to avoid congestion effects and user conflicts (Bakhtiari et al 2014).…”
Section: Determinants Of Forest Recreational Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on the frequency of open space use varies according to city; however, with particular reference to the green belt, some findings have stressed that people do not actually use it to any significant extent (Barker, 2006;Bramley et al, 2004;Kühn, 2003;Pennington, 2002). The search for reasons for this phenomenon have not, to date, produced any satisfactory explanation, although it seems possible that time taken to access these spaces may be a critical issue, as well as the desired activity once there (Bakhtiari et al, 2014). More research is therefore needed, to clarify the levels of use and activities performed in green spaces embedded in these strategies, to determine the push and pull factors affecting the green space use and, potentially, to compare how different green space strategies reflect responses to this issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%